474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27337924)
1. [Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people].
Sheng L; Qu W; Li Y; Qu Z; Wang J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 34(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 27337924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination.
Koivisto T; Chiona D; Milroy LL; McClanahan SB; Ahmad M; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1018-21. PubMed ID: 27178249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between the anatomic structures and mandibular posterior teeth for endodontic surgery in a Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
Uğur Aydın Z; Göller Bulut D
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Sep; 23(9):3637-3644. PubMed ID: 30712074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone.
Kawashima Y; Sakai O; Shosho D; Kaneda T; Gohel A
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 26725176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of mandibular canal in patients with prognathism and its clinical significance].
Ye LJ; Bo F; Liu J; Yang B; Wang YP
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Oct; 29(5):524-527. PubMed ID: 33543221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split osteotomy.
Scomparin L; Soares MQ; Rubira CM; Yaedú RY; Imada TS; Centurion BS; Tolentino ES; Lauris JR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2017 Jul; 22(4):e500-e505. PubMed ID: 28624835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Location and course of the mandibular canal in dentate patients: morphometric study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Arias A; Venegas C; Soto N; Montiel I; Farfán C; Navarro P; Fuentes R
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2020; 79(3):563-569. PubMed ID: 31565789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of the angle range in trans-inferior alveolar nerve implantation at the mandibular second molar.
Wu W; Song L; Liu J; Du L; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Tang Z; Shen M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):928. PubMed ID: 38007495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in dentate subjects.
Sîrbu VD; Perlea P; Nimigean VR; Bădiţă DG; Şerban A; Nimigean V
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2017; 58(4):1401-1408. PubMed ID: 29556634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.
Porto OCL; Silva BSF; Silva JA; Estrela CRA; Alencar AHG; Bueno MDR; Estrela C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190148. PubMed ID: 32049133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.
Srebrzyńska-Witek A; Koszowski R; Różyło-Kalinowska I
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1567-1578. PubMed ID: 29063382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography.
Swasty D; Lee JS; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 19231771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion.
Park JB; Lee JE; Kim K; Yoo JT; Kim Y; Kook YA; Ko Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24769616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].
Xie Z; Li G; Guo J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22768772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in edentate subjects.
Nimigean V; Sîrbu VD; Nimigean VR; Bădiţă DG; Poll A; Moraru SA; Păun DL
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2018; 59(1):235-242. PubMed ID: 29940633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location of the mandibular canal and thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and first molar.
Hsu JT; Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Li RW; Wu J; Tsai MT; Shen YW; Tu MG
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():608570. PubMed ID: 24302975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
