233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27338713)
1. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nearest-Neighbor Estimation for ROC Analysis under Verification Bias.
Adimari G; Chiogna M
Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 25781712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
Wu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):3937-3946. PubMed ID: 32725910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
Shi S; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data.
Hai Y; Qin G
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4789-4820. PubMed ID: 32944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.
Rodenberg C; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1256-62. PubMed ID: 11129488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):906-16. PubMed ID: 21361890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.
Fluss R; Reiser B; Faraggi D; Rotnitzky A
Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):475-90. PubMed ID: 19588455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1119-28. PubMed ID: 20222937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. bcROCsurface: an R package for correcting verification bias in estimation of the ROC surface and its volume for continuous diagnostic tests.
To Duc K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):503. PubMed ID: 29151019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 23410529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of ROC surface under verification bias.
Zhu R; Ghosal S
Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3361-3377. PubMed ID: 31049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
Zhou XH
Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian ROC curve estimation under verification bias.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Kleiner DE
Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(29):5081-96. PubMed ID: 25269427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic accuracy for predicting ordinal competing risk outcomes using ROC surfaces.
Zhang S; Qu Y; Cheng Y; Lopez OL; Wahed AS
Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jan; 28(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 34807357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests with verification bias.
Wang B; Qin G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2120-2137. PubMed ID: 24368764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
