741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27339014)
1. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
Patro K; Shaki S
Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
Cleland AA; Bull R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
Tan S; Dixon P
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.
van Dijck JP; Abrahamse EL; Acar F; Ketels B; Fias W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1500-13. PubMed ID: 24749504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain activity underlying response induced by SNARC‑congruent and SNARC‑incongruent stimuli.
Gut M; Binder M; Finc K; Szeszkowski W
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2021; 81(2):121-140. PubMed ID: 34170260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualising numerals: An ERPs study with the attentional SNARC task.
Pinto M; Fattorini E; Lasaponara S; D'Onofrio M; Fortunato G; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():1-15. PubMed ID: 29414457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
Hesse PN; Bremmer F
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect.
Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; Dehaene S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1484-99. PubMed ID: 24571534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
Roettger TB; Domahs F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
