These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

740 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27339014)

  • 21. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.
    Bull R; Benson PJ
    Horm Behav; 2006 Aug; 50(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 16595134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.
    Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V; de Hevia MD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99499. PubMed ID: 24932753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months.
    He D; He X; Zhao T; Wang J; Li L; Louwerse M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():680. PubMed ID: 32477200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. It takes just one word to quash a SNARC.
    Fischer MH; Shaki S; Cruise A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 19447752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?
    Gut M; Szumska I; Wasilewska M; Jaśkowski P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The fractions SNARC revisited: Processing fractions on a consistent mental number line.
    Toomarian EY; Hubbard EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 28697687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shifting attention does not influence numerical processing.
    Clement A; Moffat A; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3920-3930. PubMed ID: 32914341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Cutini S; Scarpa F; Scatturin P; Dell'Acqua R; Zorzi M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):444-51. PubMed ID: 23081883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections.
    De Brauwer J; Duyck W; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 17853205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task instructions determine the visuospatial and verbal-spatial nature of number-space associations.
    Georges C; Schiltz C; Hoffmann D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1895-909. PubMed ID: 25506656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.
    Aleotti S; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 35960336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.
    Galarraga DB; Pratt J; Cochrane BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):808-817. PubMed ID: 34344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.