242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27339301)
1. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study.
Jeger FB; Janner SF; Bornstein MM; Lussi A
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):884-8. PubMed ID: 22703648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography.
Connert T; Hülber-J M; Godt A; Löst C; ElAyouti A
Int Endod J; 2014 Jul; 47(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 24134733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of three electronic apex locators using conventional methods and cone beam computed tomography.
Mrasori S; Budina R; Dragidella F
Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(7-8):259-66. PubMed ID: 25299360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques.
Janner SF; Jeger FB; Lussi A; Bornstein MM
J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1046-51. PubMed ID: 21763892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endodontic Working Length Measurement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes and Field of Views, Periapical Radiography, and Apex Locator: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.
Yılmaz F; Kamburoğlu K; Şenel B
J Endod; 2017 Jan; 43(1):152-156. PubMed ID: 27986097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling.
Vizzotto MB; Silveira PF; Arús NA; Montagner F; Gomes BP; da Silveira HE
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):870-6. PubMed ID: 23442087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Accuracy of a New Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Software in the Preoperative Working Length Determination Ex Vivo.
Segato AVK; Piasecki L; Felipe Iparraguirre Nuñovero M; da Silva Neto UX; Westphalen VPD; Gambarini G; Carneiro E
J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):1024-1029. PubMed ID: 29703619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative Estimation of Endodontic Working Length with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Standardized Paralleling Technique in comparison to Its Real Length.
Faraj BM
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7890127. PubMed ID: 33102594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus cone-beam computed tomography.
Lucena C; López JM; Martín JA; Robles V; González-Rodríguez MP
Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 23772839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of CBCT parameters on the output of an automatic edge-detection-based endodontic segmentation.
Michetti J; Georgelin-Gurgel M; Mallet JP; Diemer F; Boulanouar K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20140413. PubMed ID: 26119343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the Initial Apical Canal Diameter by the First File to Bind or Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Measurements Using Micro-computed Tomography as the Gold Standard: An Ex Vivo Study in Human Cadavers.
Campello AF; Marceliano-Alves MF; Siqueira JF; Marques FV; Guedes FR; Lopes RT; Alvarenga FO; Alves FRF
J Endod; 2019 May; 45(5):619-622. PubMed ID: 30926161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endodontic length measurements using cone beam computed tomography with dedicated or conventional software at different voxel sizes.
Van Pham K
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9432. PubMed ID: 33941828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.
Williams CB; Joyce AP; Roberts S
J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):624-7. PubMed ID: 16793467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
Kqiku L; Städtler P
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
