230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27340168)
1. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
Anusha CV; Singh AA; Sam G; Sangwan B; Shilpa M; Kamath AG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual variation of the distance between nasion and Frankfort horizontal plane-an error factor of facebow in semi-adjustable articulators.
Casagrande Urdalleta DP; Olmedo RR; Cacciuttolo Fábrega FR; Biotti Picand JL
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 36309468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi NP; Hindocha AD; Gunjal AP; Balsaraf KD
Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators.
Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Friedlander LD
Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2133380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems.
Maveli TC; Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Bahjri K
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 26139043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the inclination of maxillary occlusal plane on mounted casts using a fixed value and customized nasion indicator in artex articulator: Facebow system - An in-vivo comparative study.
Ramasamy M; Karthigeyan S; Giri TC; Rajendran V; Shetty A; Deivanai M
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2013 Jun; 5(Suppl 1):S54-9. PubMed ID: 23946578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.
O'Malley AM; Milosevic A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 10864723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Strommer S; Barmak AB; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38609764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Kois JC
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38778662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does one articulator meet the needs of both fixed and removable prosthodontics?
Smith DE
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 3903123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro evaluation of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with an electronic application: A preliminary investigation.
Maveli TC; Suprono M; Kattadiyil MT; Bahjri K
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):146-151. PubMed ID: 28478988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
Thompson GA; Nick C; Francisco P; Lux L; Wiens JP
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical study of the variation in horizontal condylar guidance obtained by using three anterior points of reference and two different articulator systems.
Prajapati P; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG; Patel J
Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr; 4(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 24015003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
