These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27340168)

  • 41. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer.
    dos Santos Júnior J; Nelson SJ; Nummikoski P
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Is dynamic occlusal design necessary for anterior guidance recovery in the computer-aided design process? An in vitro study.
    Feng Y; Sun X; Li J; Liu W
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104833. PubMed ID: 38199326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interchangeability of semiadjustable articulators after 2 to 7 years of use.
    Price RB; Loney RW; Andreou P
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Sep; 9(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 11179465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators.
    Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Tabibian Y; Gazit E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 25(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 9578229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
    Inoue N; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
    Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
    Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Modification of the whip-mix articulator for reproducible fixation of various jaw relations].
    Grendelmeier A; Lang NP; Geering AH
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Oct; 88(10):1100-6. PubMed ID: 280952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of a novel rotation coordinating device on registered horizontal condylar guidance of nonarcon semi-adjustable articulators.
    Manshaee F; Najatidanesh F; Savabi O; Atash R
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():101. PubMed ID: 38020259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A study of the acceptability of lateral records by the Whip-Mix articulator.
    Bell LJ; Matich JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Jul; 38(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 267768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. True horizontal or gravity plane for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator by using an optical jaw tracking system.
    Revilla-León M; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38714458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
    Kim JE; Kim SJ; Kwon DH; Shim JS; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technique to Maintain the Correct Spatial Orientation of the Maxillary Diagnostic Cast to that of the Master Cast in a Full-Mouth Rehabilitation Case.
    Seong W; Polack MA; Delima LF; Lee J
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):271-275. PubMed ID: 33283416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new semiadjustable articulator. Part IV: an investigation of three semiadjustable articulators.
    Tanaka H; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Sep; 40(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selecting a Virtual Articulator: An Analysis of the Factors Available with Mechanical Articulators and their Potential Need for Inclusion with Virtual Articulators.
    Goldstein G; Goodacre C
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 35344633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Bennett angle. Clinical comparison of different recording methods.
    Boulos PJ; Adib SM; Naltchayan LJ
    N Y State Dent J; 2008 Mar; 74(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 18450187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Arbitrary mounting of maxillary models in the Dentatus-articulator by means of the whip-mix-quick-mount facial arch].
    Pollak J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Aug; 33(8):591-2. PubMed ID: 278741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Importance of occlusal plane reproduction on the semi-adjustable articulator in planning maxillary impactions for orthognathic surgery.
    Marchiori EC; Garcia RR; Moreira RW
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 17(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 23011674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A mathematical method for calculating the compensating anterior stop pin setting of a semiadjustable arcon articulator.
    Wright WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 2921754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.