These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27340986)

  • 1. The Effect of Intensity on the Speech Evoked Auditory Late Latency Response in Normal Hearing Individuals.
    Prakash H; Abraham A; Rajashekar B; Yerraguntla K
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Apr; 12(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.
    Jaskowski P; Rybarczyk K; Jaroszyk F
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8153244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 29(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 2036478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Billings CJ; Tremblay KL; Souza PE; Binns MA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 17389790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of stimulation parameters on auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia and major depression: an auditory evoked potential study.
    Adler G; Adler J; Schneck M; Armbruster B
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1990 May; 81(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 2356768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical auditory evoked potentials to acoustic changes in speech stimuli in children.
    Kummer P; Burger M; Schuster M; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 17726331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-evoked cortical auditory responses in children with normal hearing.
    Almeqbel A
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2013 Dec; 60():38-43. PubMed ID: 25158372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of broadband noise on cortical evoked auditory responses at different loudness levels in young adults.
    Sharma M; Purdy SC; Munro KJ; Sawaya K; Peter V
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 24323122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):316-24. PubMed ID: 2597095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR; Jho HD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory Late Latency Response in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Kumar K; Bhat J; Varghese A
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):408-411. PubMed ID: 30411704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pre-transition stimulus duration on acoustic change complex.
    Ganapathy MK; Narne VK; Kalaiah MK; Manjula P
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):350-9. PubMed ID: 23343242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Oppitz SJ; Didoné DD; Silva DD; Gois M; Folgearini J; Ferreira GC; Garcia MV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 26480901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli.
    Isoğlu-Alkaç U; Kedzior K; Keskindemirci G; Ermutlu N; Karamursel S
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 117(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 17365112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.