184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27341287)
1. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D Finite Element Models Reconstructed From 2D Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Images Improve Hip Fracture Prediction Compared to Areal BMD in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden Cohort.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Jehpsson L; Ljunggren Ö; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Isaksson H
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1258-1267. PubMed ID: 37417707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.
Dall'Ara E; Pahr D; Varga P; Kainberger F; Zysset P
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21344244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.
Cody DD; Gross GJ; Hou FJ; Spencer HJ; Goldstein SA; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech; 1999 Oct; 32(10):1013-20. PubMed ID: 10476839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir GS; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
Bone; 2013 Nov; 57(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 23907032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Bone; 2013 Jan; 52(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 22985891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2D-3D reconstruction of the proximal femur from DXA scans: Evaluation of the 3D-Shaper software.
Dudle A; Gugler Y; Pretterklieber M; Ferrari S; Lippuner K; Zysset P
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1111020. PubMed ID: 36937766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?
Viceconti M; Qasim M; Bhattacharya P; Li X
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2018 Jun; 16(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 29656377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D-DXA Based Finite Element Modelling for Femur Strength Prediction: Evaluation Against QCT.
Qasim M; López Picazo M; Ruiz Wills C; Noailly J; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Malouf Sierra J; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101471. PubMed ID: 38306806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distal skeletal tibia assessed by HR-pQCT is highly correlated with femoral and lumbar vertebra failure loads.
Kroker A; Plett R; Nishiyama KK; McErlain DD; Sandino C; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():43-49. PubMed ID: 28558915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the capability of the simulated dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-based two-dimensional finite element models for predicting vertebral failure loads.
Lu Y; Zhu Y; Krause M; Huber G; Li J
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():43-49. PubMed ID: 31147202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
