These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27342202)

  • 41. Virtual Resting Pd/Pa From Coronary Angiography and Blood Flow Modelling: Diagnostic Performance Against Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Papafaklis MI; Muramatsu T; Ishibashi Y; Bourantas CV; Fotiadis DI; Brilakis ES; Garcia-Garcia HM; Escaned J; Serruys PW; Michalis LK
    Heart Lung Circ; 2018 Mar; 27(3):377-380. PubMed ID: 28506646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Influence of Aortic Valve Obstruction on the Hyperemic Intracoronary Physiology: Difference Between Resting Pd/Pa and FFR in Aortic Stenosis.
    Scarsini R; De Maria GL; Di Gioia G; Kotronias RA; Aurigemma C; Zimbardo G; Burzotta F; Leone AM; Pesarini G; Trani C; Crea F; Kharbanda RK; De Bruyne B; Barbato E; Banning A; Ribichini F
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2019 Dec; 12(6):539-550. PubMed ID: 31119562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantification of the Effect of Pressure Wire Drift on the Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Whole-Cycle Pd/Pa.
    Cook CM; Ahmad Y; Shun-Shin MJ; Nijjer S; Petraco R; Al-Lamee R; Mayet J; Francis DP; Sen S; Davies JE
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e002988. PubMed ID: 27076571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Change in Pd/Pa: Clinical Implications for Predicting Future Cardiac Events at Deferred Coronary Lesions.
    Murai K; Kataoka Y; Kiyoshige E; Iwai T; Sawada K; Matama H; Miura H; Honda S; Fujino M; Yoneda S; Nakao K; Takagi K; Otsuka F; Asaumi Y; Nishimura K; Noguchi T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Sep; 17(9):e013830. PubMed ID: 39053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hemodynamic response to intravenous adenosine and its effect on fractional flow reserve assessment: results of the Adenosine for the Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis Severity (AFFECTS) study.
    Tarkin JM; Nijjer S; Sen S; Petraco R; Echavarria-Pinto M; Asress KN; Lockie T; Khawaja MZ; Mayet J; Hughes AD; Malik IS; Mikhail GW; Baker CS; Foale RA; Redwood S; Francis DP; Escaned J; Davies JE
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(6):654-61. PubMed ID: 24254709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Resting Coronary Flow Varies With Normal Cardiac Catheter Laboratory Stimuli.
    Modi BN; Rahman H; Arri S; Ellis H; Mills MT; Williams R; Asrress K; Clapp B; Redwood S; Perera D
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):669-673. PubMed ID: 30415969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of increasing dose of intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration during fractional flow reserve assessment.
    Verdoia M; Erbetta R; Sagazio E; Barbieri L; Negro F; Suryapranata H; Kedhi E; De Luca G;
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 284():16-21. PubMed ID: 30293665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Functional diagnosis of coronary stenoses using pressure drop coefficient: a pilot study in humans.
    Kolli KK; Helmy TA; Peelukhana SV; Arif I; Leesar MA; Back LH; Banerjee RK; Effat MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 83(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 23785016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of gender on fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Fineschi M; Guerrieri G; Orphal D; Palmerini E; Münzel T; Warnholtz A; Pierli C; Gori T
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 23392525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).
    Röther J; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Blachutzik F; Nef H; Marwan M; Schlundt C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 27307094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nitroglycerin-Derived Pd/Pa for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.
    Israeli Z; Bagur R; Murariu D; Wall S; Alemayehu M; Parviz Y; Diamantouros P; Lavi S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 29(12):E177-E183. PubMed ID: 28809723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Insufficient adenosine-induced hyperemia is a major determinant of discordance between non-hyperemic pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve.
    Matsumoto H; Higuchi S; Tanaka H; Masaki R; Kondo S; Tsujita H; Shinke T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):729. PubMed ID: 36639567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The reasons why fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are similar using wave separation analysis.
    Min S; Kang G; Paeng DG; Choi JH
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jan; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 33494709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
    Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of fractional flow reserve measurements using intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside infusions in moderately stenotic coronary artery lesions.
    Safi M; Namazi MH; Fooladi E; Vakili H; Parsa SA; Khaheshi I; Abbasi MA; Movahed MR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(7):441-443. PubMed ID: 27432209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Park JJ; Petraco R; Nam CW; Doh JH; Davies J; Escaned J; Koo BK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(4):4070-5. PubMed ID: 23890849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment.
    van de Hoef TP; Nolte F; EchavarrÍa-Pinto M; van Lavieren MA; Damman P; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; Verberne HJ; Henriques JP; van Eck-Smit BL; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Tijssen JG; Meuwissen M; Piek JJ
    Heart; 2014 Jun; 100(12):951-9. PubMed ID: 24727867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR: Are They All Equal?
    Van't Veer M; Pijls NHJ; Hennigan B; Watkins S; Ali ZA; De Bruyne B; Zimmermann FM; van Nunen LX; Barbato E; Berry C; Oldroyd KG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3088-3096. PubMed ID: 29268922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement.
    Seo MK; Koo BK; Kim JH; Shin DH; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 22647519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.