These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27342574)

  • 1. Sequential designs with small samples: Evaluation and recommendations for normal responses.
    Nikolakopoulos S; Roes KC; van der Tweel I
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1115-1127. PubMed ID: 27342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage designs with small sample sizes.
    Kieser M; Rauch G; Pilz M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 33(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 35612521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A small n sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design for use in rare disease research.
    Tamura RN; Krischer JP; Pagnoux C; Micheletti R; Grayson PC; Chen YF; Merkel PA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Jan; 46():48-51. PubMed ID: 26586608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient ways exist to obtain the optimal sample size in clinical trials in rare diseases.
    van der Lee JH; Wesseling J; Tanck MW; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 18313556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
    Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the efficiency of adaptive sample size design.
    Cui L; Zhang L
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):933-944. PubMed ID: 30450621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group sequential t-test for clinical trials with small sample sizes across stages.
    Shao J; Feng H
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 17434814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact critical values for group sequential designs with small sample sizes.
    Rom DM; McTague JA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 30(4):752-764. PubMed ID: 32151177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints.
    Asakura K; Hamasaki T; Evans SR
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):703-731. PubMed ID: 27757980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential design with boundaries approach in pediatric intervention research reduces sample size.
    van der Lee JH; Wesseling J; Tanck MW; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 19788954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Group sequential designs for three-arm 'gold standard' non-inferiority trials with fixed margin.
    Schlömer P; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4875-89. PubMed ID: 23970488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.
    Anderson KM
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 17623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-designing trial combined with classical group sequential monitoring.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 16022171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.
    Bartroff J; Lai TL
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1593-611. PubMed ID: 18275090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes.
    Mütze T; Glimm E; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2326-2347. PubMed ID: 29770729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stopping boundaries adjusted for sample size reestimation and negative stop.
    Shun Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):485-502. PubMed ID: 12477071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.