BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27343568)

  • 1. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Dandolu V; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.
    Harris JA; Sammarco AG; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Campbell D; Evilsizer S; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 28082214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
    Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
    JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
    Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
    Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
    Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
    Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
    Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience.
    Kreuninger JA; Cohen SL; Meurs EAIM; Cox M; Vitonis A; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 29192965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.