These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy. Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Clinical analysis of 48 patients with vaginal enlarged amputation of cervix]. Zeng SY; Li LY; Li CX; Shu KY; Pan M; Li HP; Luo B; An YT; Liang MR; Wu YY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 43(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 18366932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescent and young women. Fuchs K; Weitzen S; Wu L; Phipps MG; Boardman LA J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 20(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 17868892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Differentially expressed proteins among normal cervix, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Zhao Q; He Y; Wang XL; Zhang YX; Wu YM Clin Transl Oncol; 2015 Aug; 17(8):620-31. PubMed ID: 25893434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Management of Early Cervical Stromal Invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 When Margins Are Involved With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Nicholson RC; Twigg J; Roberts A; Angelopoulos G; Cruickshank D J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):129-131. PubMed ID: 29474238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization. Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Cytology at the time of cervical colposcopy. Tapisiz OL; Ertan K; Tyner J; Borahay M; Freeman DH; Kilic GS Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23589997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ? Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Szurkus DC; Harrison TA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1180-2. PubMed ID: 12748471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix. Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Frequency of recurrence after surgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1-3. Nomelini RS; Kamikabeya TS; Adad SJ; Murta EF Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 22873090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma. Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Histologic and colposcopic correlation of cervical cytology showing "? glandular neoplasia". Alazzam M; Patterson A; Shafi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 281(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 19774389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin]. Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Matthews KS; Rocconi RP; Case AS; Estes JM; Straughn JM; Huh WK J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 17415109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]