These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27344061)
1. Biodosimetry for High-Dose Exposures Based on Dicentric Analysis in Lymphocytes Released from the G2-Block by Caffeine. Karachristou I; Karakosta M; Pantelias A; Hatzi V; Pantelias G; Thanassoulas A; Karaiskos P; Dimitriou P; Terzoudi GI Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 172(1-3):230-237. PubMed ID: 27344061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of caffeine to assess high dose exposures to ionising radiation by dicentric analysis. Pujol M; Puig R; Caballín MR; Barrios L; Barquinero JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 21835842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of α-particle-induced chromosomal aberrations by chemically-induced PCC. Elaboration of dose-effect curves. Puig R; Pujol M; Barrios L; Caballín MR; Barquinero JF Int J Radiat Biol; 2016 Sep; 92(9):493-501. PubMed ID: 27454163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triage biodosimetry using centromeric/telomeric PNA probes and Giemsa staining to score dicentrics or excess fragments in non-stimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes. Karachristou I; Karakosta M; Pantelias A; Hatzi VI; Karaiskos P; Dimitriou P; Pantelias G; Terzoudi GI Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Nov; 793():107-14. PubMed ID: 26520380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dicentric chromosome aberration analysis using giemsa and centromere specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization for biological dosimetry: An inter- and intra-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories. Bhavani M; Tamizh Selvan G; Kaur H; Adhikari JS; Vijayalakshmi J; Venkatachalam P; Chaudhury NK Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Sep; 92():85-90. PubMed ID: 25014548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biodosimetry for high dose accidental exposures by drug induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay. Balakrishnan S; Shirsath K; Bhat N; Anjaria K Mutat Res; 2010 Jun; 699(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 20338261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending culture time to improve Mitotic Index for cytogenetic dosimetry. Ferreira-Lucena LR; Xavier AISF; Netto AM; Magnata SSLP; Siqueira Lima G; Amaral A Int J Radiat Biol; 2024; 100(7):1029-1040. PubMed ID: 38787719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological Dosimetry Network in Africa: Establishment of a Dose-Response Curve Using Telomere and Centromere Staining. Soumboundou M; Nkengurutse I; Dossou J; Colicchio B; Djebou C; Gadji M; Houenon G; Dem A; Dedjan A; Diarra M; Adjibade R; Finot F; Hempel W; Dieterlen A; Jeandidier E; Rodriguez-Lafrasse C; M'kacher R Health Phys; 2019 Dec; 117(6):618-624. PubMed ID: 31211757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of spontaneous dicentric frequencies and establishment of dose-response curves after expose of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to low- and high-dose rate Pham ND; Nguyen MH; Tran Q; Che QT; Nguyen VH; Phan VT; Pham VD; Ern Lee S; Vo TL Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Mar; 95(3):307-313. PubMed ID: 30481092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intercomparison of conventional and QuickScan dicentric scoring for the validation of individual biodosimetry analysis in Taiwan. Lin WC; Chang KW; Liao TZ; Ou Yang FY; Chang TJ; Yuan MC; Wilkins RC; Chang CH Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(7):916-925. PubMed ID: 34003708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of scoring PCC rings and fragments for dose assessment after high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. Puig R; Barrios L; Pujol M; Caballín MR; Barquinero JF Mutat Res; 2013 Sep; 757(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23872317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of chromosome damage for biodosimetry using imaging flow cytometry. Beaton LA; Ferrarotto C; Kutzner BC; McNamee JP; Bellier PV; Wilkins RC Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):192-5. PubMed ID: 23618924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Simple Method for Human Whole Blood Microcultures and Its Application in Radiation Biodosimetry. Yan G; Wen Z; Chaoxian G; Changye H; Xueqin Y; Xinyue Y; Zhimin L Health Phys; 2015 Oct; 109(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 26313591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods. Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential radiation effects in smokers--culture time dependence of the yield of gamma ray-induced chromosome damage in first division metaphases. Krishnaja AP; Sharma NK Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 May; 82(5):363-77. PubMed ID: 16782654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytogenetics for Biological Dosimetry. Ricoul M; Gnana-Sekaran T; Piqueret-Stephan L; Sabatier L Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():189-208. PubMed ID: 27910025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of spectral karyotyping (SKY) in biodosimetry for the triage situation following gamma irradiation. Szeles A; Joussineau S; Lewensohn R; Lagercrantz S; Larsson C Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Feb; 82(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16546907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytogenetic methods for biodosimetry and risk individualisation after exposure to ionising radiation. Terzoudi GI; Pantelias GE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 17169946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Rapid dicentric assay of human blood lymphocytes after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation]. Repin MV; Repina LA Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2011; 51(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 21950098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]