281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27344163)
21. Linking bait and feeding opportunities to fish foraging habitat for the assessment of environmental flows and river restoration.
Zhang P; Li K; Liu Q; Liu R; Qin L; Wang H; Zhang Z; Wang K; Wang Y; Liang R; Zhu Z
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 768():144580. PubMed ID: 33736339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Untangling the effects of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in European running waters.
Schinegger R; Palt M; Segurado P; Schmutz S
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():1079-1088. PubMed ID: 27632785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of science-based restoration planning to a desert river system.
Laub BG; Jimenez J; Budy P
Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1246-61. PubMed ID: 25850614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Water-energy-ecosystem nexus modeling using multi-objective, non-linear programming in a regulated river: Exploring tradeoffs among environmental flows, cascaded small hydropower, and inter-basin water diversion projects.
Yin D; Li X; Wang F; Liu Y; Croke BFW; Jakeman AJ
J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114582. PubMed ID: 35123200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Environmental flows and water quality objectives for the River Murray.
Gippel C; Jacobs T; McLeod T
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):251-60. PubMed ID: 12171360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimizing environmental flow based on a new optimization model in balancing objectives among river ecology, water supply and power generation in a high-latitude river.
Qi P; Tang X; Xu YJ; Cui Z; Sun J; Zhang G; Wu Y; Jiang M
J Environ Manage; 2023 Sep; 342():118261. PubMed ID: 37290311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Response of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to current water management in Alpine catchments massively developed for hydropower.
Quadroni S; Crosa G; Gentili G; Espa P
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():484-496. PubMed ID: 28755598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative Assessment of Environmental Flow Estimation Methods in a Mediterranean Mountain River.
Papadaki C; Soulis K; Ntoanidis L; Zogaris S; Dercas N; Dimitriou E
Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):280-292. PubMed ID: 28478601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Linkages between flow regime, biota, and ecosystem processes: Implications for river restoration.
Palmer M; Ruhi A
Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6459):. PubMed ID: 31604208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An electricity market-based approach to finance environmental flow restoration.
Dalcin AP; Marques GF; Tilmant A; Viers JH; Medellín-Azuara J
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 353():120231. PubMed ID: 38295638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimum flows and levels method of the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida, USA.
Neubauer CP; Hall GB; Lowe EF; Robison CP; Hupalo RB; Keenan LW
Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):1101-14. PubMed ID: 18802732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of sediment-transport evaluations for development of modeled instream flows: policy and approach in Texas.
Heitmuller FT; Raphelt N
J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 102():37-49. PubMed ID: 22425877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hydrological and thermal effects of hydropeaking on early life stages of salmonids: A modelling approach for implementing mitigation strategies.
Casas-Mulet R; Saltveit SJ; Alfredsen KT
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():1660-1672. PubMed ID: 27720256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Potential impacts of climate change on flow regime and fish habitat in mountain rivers of the south-western Balkans.
Papadaki C; Soulis K; Muñoz-Mas R; Martinez-Capel F; Zogaris S; Ntoanidis L; Dimitriou E
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 540():418-28. PubMed ID: 26250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of flow ramping in water bodies impacted by hydropower operation in Norway - Is hydropower with environmental restrictions more sustainable?
Halleraker JH; Kenawi MS; L'Abée-Lund JH; Bakken TH; Alfredsen K
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 832():154776. PubMed ID: 35390377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ecologically-based criteria for hydropeaking mitigation: A review.
Moreira M; Hayes DS; Boavida I; Schletterer M; Schmutz S; Pinheiro A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():1508-1522. PubMed ID: 30677917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of dams and weirs operating for water resource management of the Geum River.
Ahn JM; Lee S; Kang T
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Apr; 478():103-15. PubMed ID: 24530590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flow Restoration in the Columbia River Basin: An Evaluation of a Flow Restoration Accounting Framework.
McCoy AL; Holmes SR; Boisjolie BA
Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 61(3):506-519. PubMed ID: 28856404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Implementation of Environmental Flows for Intermittent River Systems: Adaptive Management and Stakeholder Participation Facilitate Implementation.
Conallin J; Wilson E; Campbell J
Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 61(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 28866735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A dataset of eco-evidence tools to inform early-stage environmental impact assessments of hydropower development.
McManamay RA; Parish ES; DeRolph CR
Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105629. PubMed ID: 32426425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
