These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27344235)

  • 1. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation.
    Hui S; Yi L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
    Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
    Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
    Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
    Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].
    El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.