These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Network-Based Meta-Analyses of Associations of Multiple Gene Expression Profiles with Bone Mineral Density Variations in Women. He H; Cao S; Niu T; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Zhu W; Wang YP; Deng HW PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147475. PubMed ID: 26808152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis without study-specific variance information: Heterogeneity case. Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Niwitpong SA; Adams S; Stanton M; Holling H Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 28681700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel estimator of between-study variance in random-effects models. Wang N; Zhang J; Xu L; Qi J; Liu B; Tang Y; Jiang Y; Cheng L; Jiang Q; Yin X; Jin S BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 32046631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparse meta-analysis with high-dimensional data. He Q; Zhang HH; Avery CL; Lin DY Biostatistics; 2016 Apr; 17(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 26395907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis methods for combining multiple expression profiles: comparisons, statistical characterization and an application guideline. Chang LC; Lin HM; Sibille E; Tseng GC BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 14():368. PubMed ID: 24359104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel random effect model for GWAS meta-analysis and its application to trans-ethnic meta-analysis. Shi J; Lee S Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):945-54. PubMed ID: 26916671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer. Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel bi-level meta-analysis approach: applied to biological pathway analysis. Nguyen T; Tagett R; Donato M; Mitrea C; Draghici S Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 26471455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis approaches to combine multiple gene set enrichment studies. Lu W; Wang X; Zhan X; Gazdar A Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(4):659-672. PubMed ID: 29052247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. DerSimonian R; Kacker R Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations. Cheung MW; Cheung SF Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]