These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27345652)

  • 21. Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: a model for acute care nurse practitioners.
    Dulko D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 18076463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap?
    Hewett DG; Kahi CJ; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 20889071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unregulated provider perceptions of audit and feedback reports in long-term care: cross-sectional survey findings from a quality improvement intervention.
    Fraser KD; O'Rourke HM; Baylon MA; Boström AM; Sales AE
    BMC Geriatr; 2013 Feb; 13():15. PubMed ID: 23402382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A commentary on the quality improvement practices in leading an organizational response to audit feedback.
    Sykes M
    JBI Evid Implement; 2022 Sep; 20(3):166-171. PubMed ID: 36373355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change.
    Landis-Lewis Z; Brehaut JC; Hochheiser H; Douglas GP; Jacobson RS
    Implement Sci; 2015 Jan; 10():12. PubMed ID: 25603806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program.
    Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Dec; 17(1):803. PubMed ID: 29197382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.
    Catlow J; Bhardwaj-Gosling R; Sharp L; Rutter MD; Sniehotta FF
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2022 Oct; 31(10):704-715. PubMed ID: 34893545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audit and feedback in mental healthcare: staff experiences.
    Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Aug; 31(7):822-833. PubMed ID: 30354880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.
    Ball JE; Osbourne J; Jowett S; Pellen M; Welfare MR
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7467):665-7. PubMed ID: 15374917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality measures and quality improvements in colonoscopy.
    Ketwaroo GA; Sawhney MS
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 31(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25402548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mental models of audit and feedback in primary care settings.
    Hysong SJ; Smitham K; SoRelle R; Amspoker A; Hughes AM; Haidet P
    Implement Sci; 2018 May; 13(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State of the Science on Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and How to Achieve Them.
    May FP; Shaukat A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Aug; 115(8):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 32759620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres.
    Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Huppertz-Hauss G; Kittang E; Stallemo A; Høie O; Dahler S; Nyhus S; Halvorsen FA; Pallenschat J; Vetvik K; Kristian Sandvei P; Friestad J; Pytte R; Coll P
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):481-7. PubMed ID: 16635918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Quality and outcome assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: study of 202 colonoscopies].
    Fratté S; Daucourt V; Fatisse A; Winkfield B
    Presse Med; 2008 Sep; 37(9):1212-9. PubMed ID: 18329232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Audit & Feedback: how it works.].
    Di Blasio N; Acampora A; Angelici L; Pagano E; Ciccone G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2022 Dec; 113(12):733-738. PubMed ID: 36420849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK.
    Gavin DR; Valori RM; Anderson JT; Donnelly MT; Williams JG; Swarbrick ET
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 22661458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study.
    de Weerdt V; Ybema S; Repping S; van der Hijden E; Willems H
    BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e081063. PubMed ID: 38589258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.