These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27345967)

  • 1. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-world research and the role of observational data in the field of gynaecology - a practical review.
    Heikinheimo O; Bitzer J; García Rodríguez L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Aug; 22(4):250-259. PubMed ID: 28817972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing strength of evidence for regulatory decision making in licensing: What proof do we need for observational studies of effectiveness?
    Slattery J; Kurz X
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1336-1340. PubMed ID: 32301230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.
    Weintraub WS; Yeh RW
    Am J Med; 2018 Feb; 131(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 29103925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.
    Hernán MA; Hernández-Díaz S; Robins JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Oct; 159(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 24018844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?
    Onukwugha E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Electronic Medical Records to Assess the Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy in Pain: A Review of Recent Observational Studies.
    Biltaji E; Tak C; Ma J; Ruiz-Negron N; Bellows BK
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2016 Sep; 30(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 27261324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.
    Ramsey S; Willke R; Briggs A; Brown R; Buxton M; Chawla A; Cook J; Glick H; Liljas B; Petitti D; Reed S
    Value Health; 2005; 8(5):521-33. PubMed ID: 16176491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing wisely between randomized controlled trials and observational designs in studies about interventions.
    Ferreira JC; Patino CM
    J Bras Pneumol; 2016; 42(3):165. PubMed ID: 27383927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.
    Hannan EL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jun; 1(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19463302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observational studies - should we simply ignore them in assessing transfusion outcomes?
    Trentino K; Farmer S; Gross I; Shander A; Isbister J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 27741940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.
    Desai RJ; Franklin JM
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5657. PubMed ID: 31645336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observational data: Understanding the real MS world.
    Kalincik T; Butzkueven H
    Mult Scler; 2016 Nov; 22(13):1642-1648. PubMed ID: 27270498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Real-world evidence.].
    De Fiore L; Addis A
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Dec; 108(12):497-499. PubMed ID: 29297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Added value of observational studies in surgery: the hierarchical structure of study designs requires a more refined approach].
    Beks RB; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2017; 161():D1493. PubMed ID: 28488557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study Design in Neurosurgical Research: Considerations for Observational and Experimental Cohort Studies.
    Louie CE; D'Agostino E; Woods A; Ryken T
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31552423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observational studies: why are they so important?
    Mariani AW; Pêgo-Fernandes PM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24474072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposal for Standardized Tabular Reporting of Observational Surgical Studies Illustrated in a Study on Primary Repair of Bile Duct Injuries.
    Cho JY; Jaeger AR; Sanford DE; Fields RC; Strasberg SM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Sep; 221(3):678-88. PubMed ID: 26228012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.