These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27346965)
1. A model for managing and monitoring the quality of glucometers used in a high-volume clinical setting. Aykal G; Yegin A; Tekeli Ö; Yilmaz N Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27346965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clarke Error Grid Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Glucometers in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital. Sengupta S; Handoo A; Haq I; Dahiya K; Mehta S; Kaushik M Indian J Clin Biochem; 2022 Apr; 37(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 35463101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach. Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice. Ho HT; Yeung WK; Young BW Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jul; 89(4):F356-9. PubMed ID: 15210675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical evaluation of connectivity-based point of care testing systems of glucose in a hospital environment. Floré KM; Fiers T; Delanghe JR Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(12):1763-8. PubMed ID: 19055453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of i-SENS glucometers in neonates using capillary blood samples. Kim HN; Yoon SY Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 33915605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance evaluation of three i-SENS glucometers using arterial blood samples compared with the YSI 2300 Glucose Analyzer. Kim HN; Moon KC; Yoon SY J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Aug; 34(8):e23356. PubMed ID: 32430994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of hematocrit on accuracy of two point-of-care glucometers for use in dogs. Paul AE; Shiel RE; Juvet F; Mooney CT; Mansfield CS Am J Vet Res; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1204-8. PubMed ID: 21879978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outpatient point of care glucose testing vs venous glucose in the clinical laboratory. Velázquez Medina D; Climent C P R Health Sci J; 2003 Dec; 22(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 14768505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of glucometers currently used in Sri Lanka. Liyanage JH; Dissanayake HA; Gamage KKK; Keerthisena GSP; Ihalagama IRHS; Weeratunga PN; Wijesundara WA; Wijetunga WMUA; Subasinghe S; Tilakaratne TAD; Katulanda GW; Katulanda P Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2019; 13(3):2184-2188. PubMed ID: 31235155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical performance of glucometers used for routine glucose self-monitoring of diabetic patients. Solnica B; Naskalski JW; Sieradzki J Clin Chim Acta; 2003 May; 331(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 12691861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of glucometers used in hospitals and in outpatient settings with the laboratory reference method in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai. Ullal A; Parmar GM; Chauhan PH Indian J Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Dec; 17(Suppl 3):S688-93. PubMed ID: 24910840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients. Hoedemaekers CW; Klein Gunnewiek JM; Prinsen MA; Willems JL; Van der Hoeven JG Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3062-6. PubMed ID: 18824915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods. Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and precision of four main glucometers used in a Sub-Saharan African Country: a cross-sectional study. Choukem SP; Sih C; Nebongo D; Tientcheu P; Kengne AP Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():118. PubMed ID: 31223408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Educational intervention together with an on-line quality control program achieve recommended analytical goals for bedside blood glucose monitoring in a 1200-bed university hospital. Sánchez-Margalet V; Rodriguez-Oliva M; Sánchez-Pozo C; Fernández-Gallardo MF; Goberna R Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(8):876-9. PubMed ID: 16201900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of GLUCOCARD X-METER glucose monitoring system]. Kwon MJ; Lee SY Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Feb; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18309250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Human and Veterinary Point-of-Care Glucometers for Use in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys), and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Clemmons EA; Stovall MI; Owens DC; Scott JA; Jones-Wilkes AC; Kempf DJ; Ethun KF J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2016; 55(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 27177571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The analytical quality and comparability value of four glucometers from different manufacturers]. Horovskaia LA; Lobachevskaia TV; Chernichuk OV Klin Lab Diagn; 2015 Jan; 60(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 25874308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of accuracy and influence factors of bedside blood glucose monitoring in critically ill patients]. Feng T; Cao XY Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2012 Aug; 24(8):482-6. PubMed ID: 22871408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]