These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27347717)

  • 1. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Horizontal sound localisation accuracy in individuals with conductive hearing loss: effect of the bone conduction implant.
    Asp F; Reinfeldt S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 29764239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant.
    Hol MK; Nelissen RC; Agterberg MJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1071-5. PubMed ID: 23598702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.
    Snapp H; Vogt K; Agterberg MJH
    Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107881. PubMed ID: 31945691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.
    Chordekar S; Perez R; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing gain with a BAHA test-band in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Kim DY; Kim TS; Shim BS; Jin IS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Yoon TH; Park HJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24035184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
    Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Nelissen RC; Agterberg MJ; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 273(10):3149-56. PubMed ID: 26924741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing rehabilitation with the closed skin bone-anchored implant Sophono Alpha1: results of a prospective study in 15 children with ear atresia.
    Denoyelle F; Coudert C; Thierry B; Parodi M; Mazzaschi O; Vicaut E; Tessier N; Loundon N; Garabedian EN
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 25617189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.
    Powell HR; Rolfe AM; Birman CS
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26375976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features.
    Curca IA; Parsa V; Macpherson EA; Scollie S; Vansevenant K; Zimmerman K; Lewis-Teeter J; Allen P; Parnes L; Agrawal S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three approaches to verifying aided Baha output.
    Hodgetts WE; Håkansson BE; Hagler P; Soli S
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 20053158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.