188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27348455)
21. Few microorganisms associated with bacterial vaginosis may constitute the pathologic core: a population-based microbiologic study among 3596 pregnant women.
Thorsen P; Jensen IP; Jeune B; Ebbesen N; Arpi M; Bremmelgaard A; Møller BR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 178(3):580-7. PubMed ID: 9539529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical characteristics of vaginal discharge in bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by Nugent's criteria.
Hapsari ED; Hayashi M; Matsuo H
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2006; 33(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16761528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Frequency of Gardnerella vaginalis vaginosis and its association with other pathogens causing genital infections in the female].
Mendoza-González A; Sánchez-Vega JT; Sánchez-Peón I; Ruiz-Sánchez D; Tay-Zavala J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Jul; 69():272-6. PubMed ID: 11588810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical and microbiological evaluation of bacterial vaginosis in women in a hospital from Rio Cuarto, Argentina].
Barberis IL; Pájaro MC; Godino S; Pascual L; Albesa L
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1996 Dec; 14(10):611-3. PubMed ID: 9053005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.
Menard JP; Mazouni C; Fenollar F; Raoult D; Boubli L; Bretelle F
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 20814710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The International Infections in Pregnancy (IIP) study: variations in the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and distribution of morphotypes in vaginal smears among pregnant women.
Tolosa JE; Chaithongwongwatthana S; Daly S; Maw WW; Gaitán H; Lumbiganon P; Festin M; Chipato T; Sauvarin J; Goldenberg RL; Andrews WW; Whitney CG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 17074543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Frequency of Gardnerella vaginalis in vaginal smears of hysterectomized women].
Nai GA; Mello AL; Ferreira AD; Barbosa RL
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2007; 53(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17568922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a routine diagnostic laboratory.
Burns FM; Gould IM; Patterson A; Wood WJ
Med Lab Sci; 1992 Mar; 49(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 1453913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women.
Krohn MA; Hillier SL; Eschenbach DA
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A comparison of 2 clinical laboratory methods in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
González-Pedraza-Avilés A; Inzunza-Montiel A; Ortiz-Zaragoza C; Ponce-Rosas R; Irigoyen-Coria A
Aten Primaria; 1997 Apr; 19(7):357-60. PubMed ID: 9254139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic method for bacterial vaginosis.
Obata-Yasuoka M; Ba-Thein W; Hamada H; Hayashi H
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 100(4):759-64. PubMed ID: 12383546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laboratory diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis vaginosis.
Okwoli RN; Adinma JL; Nnaeze CN
West Afr J Med; 2002; 21(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 12744579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of
Redelinghuys MJ; Ehlers MM; Bezuidenhoudt JE; Becker PJ; Kock MM
Sex Transm Infect; 2017 Sep; 93(6):410-415. PubMed ID: 28143901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison between Gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora.
Verhelst R; Verstraelen H; Claeys G; Verschraegen G; Van Simaey L; De Ganck C; De Backer E; Temmerman M; Vaneechoutte M
BMC Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 5():61. PubMed ID: 16225680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of affirm VP Microbial Identification Test for Gardnerella vaginalis and Trichomonas vaginalis.
Briselden AM; Hillier SL
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jan; 32(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 8126171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Importance of isolation and biotypization of Gardnerella vaginalis in diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Numanović F; Hukić M; Nurkić M; Gegić M; Delibegović Z; Imamović A; Pasić S
Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2008 Aug; 8(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 18816262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gene polymorphisms of Toll-like and related recognition receptors in relation to the vaginal carriage of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae.
Verstraelen H; Verhelst R; Nuytinck L; Roelens K; De Meester E; De Vos D; Van Thielen M; Rossau R; Delva W; De Backer E; Vaneechoutte M; Temmerman M
J Reprod Immunol; 2009 Jan; 79(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 19200604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of co-infection of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae using qualitative PCR: A better predictor of bacterial vaginosis.
Sehgal PG; Dadwal R; Sharma B; Sehgal A; Bagga R; Chopra S; Angrup A; Yadav R; Sharma N; Sethi S
Anaerobe; 2021 Jun; 69():102343. PubMed ID: 33582302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Studies on the anaerobic (bacterial) vaginosis among the Bangladeshi women of reproductive age group.
Naher A; Rahman KM; Hassan MM; Hoq JA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1994 Dec; 20(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 7748151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Gardnerella vaginalis.
Higashide S; Cho O; Matsuda Y; Ogishima D; Kurakado S; Sugita T
Microbiol Immunol; 2018 Sep; 62(9):607-611. PubMed ID: 30106188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
