These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27348715)

  • 1. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.
    Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
    Redlich AD; Ozdoğru AA
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):467-88. PubMed ID: 19405036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Less guilty by reason of adolescence: developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty.
    Steinberg L; Scott ES
    Am Psychol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):1009-18. PubMed ID: 14664689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perceived guilt and innocence of adults with developmental language disorder and adults with typical language during a mock interrogation.
    Spaulding TJ; Blewitt A
    J Commun Disord; 2024; 110():106429. PubMed ID: 38754317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: a comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants.
    Bonnie RJ; Hoge SK; Monahan J; Poythress N; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 9323652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.
    Clark SE; Godfrey RD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 19145007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it inherently prejudicial to try a juvenile as an adult?
    Levine M; Williams A; Sixt A; Valenti R
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11241679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision making in delinquency cases: the role of race and juveniles' admission/denial of the crime.
    Ruback RB; Vardaman PJ
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Feb; 21(1):47-69. PubMed ID: 9058573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hypnotically elicited testimony on jurors' judgments of guilt and innocence.
    Wagstaff GF; Vella M; Perfect T
    J Soc Psychol; 1992 Oct; 132(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 1453692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 15796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responsibility, guilt, and decision under risk.
    Mancini F; Gangemi A
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1077-9. PubMed ID: 14765573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The court's effectiveness in protecting the rights of juveniles in delinquency cases.
    Ainsworth JE
    Future Child; 1996; 6(3):64-74. PubMed ID: 9117367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney-juvenile client relationship.
    Schmidt MG; Reppucci ND; Woolard JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):175-98. PubMed ID: 12645044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals.
    Viljoen JL; Klaver J; Roesch R
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):253-77. PubMed ID: 15965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arresting and convicting the innocent: the potential role of an "inappropriate" emotional display in the accused.
    Heath WP
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 19385000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.