These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27348715)

  • 1. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.
    Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
    Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
    Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.
    Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
    Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers.
    Dezember A; Redlich AD
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Aug; 48(4):262-280. PubMed ID: 39325405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guilty pleas of youths and adults: Differences in legal knowledge and decision making.
    Zottoli TM; Daftary-Kapur T
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):166-179. PubMed ID: 30570279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.
    Zottoli TM; Helm RK; Edkins VA; Bixter MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 47(3):403-421. PubMed ID: 37326548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power, Process, and Protection: Juveniles as Defendants in the Justice System.
    Woolard JL; Henning K; Fountain E
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2016; 51():171-201. PubMed ID: 27474426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders.
    Malloy LC; Shulman EP; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 24127891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
    Redlich AD; Ozdoğru AA
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):467-88. PubMed ID: 19405036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors.
    Cardenas SA; Sanchez PY; Kassin SM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231185639. PubMed ID: 37491946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
    Semple JK; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Less guilty by reason of adolescence: developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty.
    Steinberg L; Scott ES
    Am Psychol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):1009-18. PubMed ID: 14664689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.