91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27348882)
1. Negative online reviews: 5 ways to lessen the impact.
Perna G
Med Econ; 2016 Mar; 93(6):57. PubMed ID: 27348882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction reviews: expression of opinion or defamation?
Regan J; Smith L; Miles E
Tenn Med; 2009 Mar; 102(3):41-2. PubMed ID: 19354060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal remedies for online defamation of physicians.
Segal J; Sacopulos MJ; Rivera DJ
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(3):349-88. PubMed ID: 19681012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Managing your online reputation.
Segal J
J Med Pract Manage; 2012; 27(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 22834178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posting doc-patient reviews pays off.
Schiff J
Mod Healthc; 2016 Jan; 46(3):28. PubMed ID: 27088154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Own your online reputation before someone else does.
Perna G
Med Econ; 2016 Feb; 93(4):74-7. PubMed ID: 27079079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Simple steps to protect your online reputation.
Segal J
Todays FDA; 2012; 24(6):22-3, 25, 27. PubMed ID: 23166995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Online and on target. Hospitals add sophistication to their websites, improving value to patients.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2011 Feb; 41(7):32-3. PubMed ID: 21446638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hunting for health: patients are searching for more medical info online.
Flschman J
US News World Rep; 2005 May; 138(20):46. PubMed ID: 15957329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Posts to online news message boards and public discourse surrounding DUI enforcement.
Connor SM; Wesolowski K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):546-51. PubMed ID: 19916124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survivors seeking cancer information online can experience disenchantment, empowerment.
Becze E
ONS Connect; 2011 Apr; 26(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 21661281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Using patient-reported experiences for pharmacovigilance?
Adams SA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 194():63-8. PubMed ID: 23941932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online reviews of physicians: what are your patients posting about you?
Pasternak A; Scherger JE
Fam Pract Manag; 2009; 16(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 19492765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Online health information seeking in the context of the medical consultation in Switzerland.
Caiata-Zufferey M; Abraham A; Sommerhalder K; Schulz PJ
Qual Health Res; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1050-61. PubMed ID: 20442347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of internet use on the public perception of physicians: a perspective from the sociology of professions literature.
Lowrey W; Anderson WB
Health Commun; 2006; 19(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 16548703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication.
Minol K; Spelsberg G; Schulte E; Morris N
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 17703484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing your online presence.
Phairas D; Porciuncula A
Med Econ; 2011 Oct; 88(19):28-9. PubMed ID: 22175199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physicians utilisation of internet medical databases at the tertiary health institutions in Osun State, south west, Nigeria.
Shabi IN; Shabi OM; Akewukereke MA; Udofia EP
Health Info Libr J; 2011 Dec; 28(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 22051130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online reputation management: the first steps.
Gay S; Pho K
J Med Pract Manage; 2013; 29(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 24228366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
