These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27349089)

  • 1. Defining the scale of habitat availability for models of habitat selection.
    Paton RS; Matthiopoulos J
    Ecology; 2016 May; 97(5):1113-22. PubMed ID: 27349089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the effect of habitat availability on species distributions.
    Aarts G; Fieberg J; Brasseur S; Matthiopoulos J
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1135-45. PubMed ID: 23550611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Within Reach? Habitat Availability as a Function of Individual Mobility and Spatial Structuring.
    Matthiopoulos J; Fieberg J; Aarts G; Barraquand F; Kendall BE
    Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):1009-1026. PubMed ID: 32469662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential resource selection within shared habitat types across spatial scales in sympatric toads.
    Indermaur L; Winzeler T; Schmidt BR; Tockner K; Schaub M
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3430-44. PubMed ID: 20120811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection.
    Godvik IM; Loe LE; Vik JO; Veiberg V; Langvatn R; Mysterud A
    Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 19341140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.
    Van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Basille M; Gaillard JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 25980987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional responses in animal movement explain spatial heterogeneity in animal-habitat relationships.
    Mason THE; Fortin D
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):960-971. PubMed ID: 28390110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial scale and movement behaviour traits control the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness.
    Cattarino L; McAlpine CA; Rhodes JR
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 26250334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. REVIEW: Can habitat selection predict abundance?
    Boyce MS; Johnson CJ; Merrill EH; Nielsen SE; Solberg EJ; van Moorter B
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 25786026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Landscape context affects genetic diversity at a much larger spatial extent than population abundance.
    Jackson ND; Fahrig L
    Ecology; 2014 Apr; 95(4):871-81. PubMed ID: 24933807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring and selecting scales of effect for landscape predictors in species-habitat models.
    Martin AE; Fahrig L
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Dec; 22(8):2277-92. PubMed ID: 23387125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multi-scale distribution model for non-equilibrium populations suggests resource limitation in an endangered rodent.
    Bean WT; Stafford R; Butterfield HS; Brashares JS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106638. PubMed ID: 25237807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional responses in habitat selection: clarifying hypotheses and interpretations.
    Holbrook JD; Olson LE; DeCesare NJ; Hebblewhite M; Squires JR; Steenweg R
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Apr; 29(3):e01852. PubMed ID: 30653797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of incorporating functional habitats into conservation planning for highly mobile species in dynamic systems.
    Webb MH; Terauds A; Tulloch A; Bell P; Stojanovic D; Heinsohn R
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 28130909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locally dispersing populations in heterogeneous dynamic landscapes with spatiotemporal correlations. I. Block disturbance.
    Hiebeler DE; Houle J; Drummond F; Bilodeau P; Merckens J
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():212-224. PubMed ID: 27460587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting local and non-local effects of resources on animal space use using a mechanistic step selection model.
    Potts JR; Bastille-Rousseau G; Murray DL; Schaefer JA; Lewis MA
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2014 Mar; 5(3):253-262. PubMed ID: 25834721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in habitat selection mediate landscape level predictions of a functional response.
    Newediuk L; Prokopenko CM; Vander Wal E
    Oecologia; 2022 Jan; 198(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 34984521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Hooper RJ; Gordon IJ
    Oecologia; 2013 Nov; 173(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 23719900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal.
    van Beest FM; Uzal A; Vander Wal E; Laforge MP; Contasti AL; Colville D; McLoughlin PD
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23931034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-individual consistency in habitat selection patterns and spatial range constraints of female little bustards during the non-breeding season.
    Cuscó F; Cardador L; Bota G; Morales MB; Mañosa S
    BMC Ecol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 30518359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.