These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27350096)

  • 1. Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.
    Karim AKMR; Proulx MJ; Likova LT
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2016 Sep; 68():669-693. PubMed ID: 27350096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.
    Friedrich TE; Harms VL; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2014; 19(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 24527986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateral biases and reading direction: a dissociation between aesthetic preference and line bisection.
    Ishii Y; Okubo M; Nicholls ME; Imai H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 21215506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy.
    Nava E; de Hevia MD; Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105326. PubMed ID: 34883319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlates of Perceptual Orientation Biases in Human Primary Visual Cortex.
    Patten ML; Mannion DJ; Clifford CWG
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(18):4744-4750. PubMed ID: 28385875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does reading direction modulate perceptual asymmetry effects?
    Chung HK; Liu JY; Hsiao JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27223256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prism adaptation in the healthy brain: the shift in line bisection judgments is long lasting and fluctuates.
    Schintu S; Pisella L; Jacobs S; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():165-70. PubMed ID: 24291512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disorders of visuospatial orientation in the frontal plane in patients with visual neglect following right or left parietal lesions.
    Kerkhoff G; Zoelch C
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Sep; 122(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 9772118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection.
    Thomas NA; Rose W; Nicholls ME
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 26529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The asymmetrical effect of leftward and rightward prisms on intact visuospatial cognition.
    Schintu S; Patané I; Caldano M; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():23-31. PubMed ID: 29078083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex.
    St John-Saaltink E; Kok P; Lau HC; de Lange FP
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 36(23):6186-92. PubMed ID: 27277797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring bias in horizontal and vertical spatial representations using mental number lines and the greyscales task.
    Bultitude JH; Ten Brink AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Mar; 243():104115. PubMed ID: 38228071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.