These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2735110)

  • 1. [Adaptation of the viscoelastic behavior of bone cement to bone as a stabilizing factor in endoprostheses].
    Nikiforidis G; Bezerianos A; Lambiris E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1989; 127(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 2735110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.
    Saha S; Pal S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Apr; 18(4):435-62. PubMed ID: 6376513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 May; 29(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 7622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 10147450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experiences, requirements and development of cement-free hip endoprostheses].
    Morscher E
    Orthopade; 1987 Jun; 16(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 3627791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.
    Askew MJ; Steege JW; Lewis JL; Ranieri JR; Wixson RL
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 6491790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements.
    Chwirut DJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Jan; 18(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 6699030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study on the mechanical properties of bone cement (methylmethacrylate) and its strength alteration in vivo (author's transl)].
    Kon H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 55(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7276662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The viscosity of acrylic bone cements.
    Krause WR; Miller J; Ng P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 May; 16(3):219-43. PubMed ID: 7085686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement-human bone interfaces.
    Kusleika R; Stupp SI
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 6863348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives: a nanoindentation study.
    Sadr A; Shimada Y; Lu H; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 18579198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study.
    Majkowski RS; Bannister GC; Miles AW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):293-7. PubMed ID: 8119032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.
    Miller MA; Race A; Gupta S; Higham P; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 17197317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experimental studies on the strength of the bond between bones and bone cement].
    Jaster D; Seyfarth M
    Beitr Orthop Traumatol; 1975 Dec; 22(12):666-9. PubMed ID: 1227479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of the cement-bone interface.
    Krause WR; Krug W; Miller J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):290-9. PubMed ID: 7067264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Damage accumulation, fatigue and creep behaviour of vacuum mixed bone cement.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Taylor M
    Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(27):5532-41. PubMed ID: 15860209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.