266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27351121)
1. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
Siedlecki SL
Nurs Manage; 2016 Jul; 47(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 27351121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust.
Flaherty DK
Ann Pharmacother; 2013; 47(7-8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 23585648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only.
Behl C
J Cell Biochem; 2021 Nov; 122 Suppl 1():S7. PubMed ID: 34715723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
American Chemical Society
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):17A-19A. PubMed ID: 14733211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
Siedlecki SL
Nursing; 2015 Dec; 45(12):51-4. PubMed ID: 26580113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating predatory scholarship: best practices in scholarly publication.
Gonzalez J; Bridgeman MB; Hermes-DeSantis ER
Int J Pharm Pract; 2018 Feb; 26(1):73-76. PubMed ID: 28664997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cutting the cake! Publication ethics in science.
Svensson P; Andersson L
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 40(7):483. PubMed ID: 23521045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maintaining Research and Publication Integrity.
Rifai N; Annesley TM; Moore S; Caplan AL; Sweet DJ; Hornung P; Rosendaal FR
Clin Chem; 2019 Feb; 65(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 30559173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The peer review process and JSES procedures.
Iannotti JP; Mallon WJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Feb; 22(2):149. PubMed ID: 23352468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity.
Hillard T; Baber R
Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit.
Nicholls SG; Langan SM; Benchimol EI; Moher D
BMC Med; 2016 Mar; 14():44. PubMed ID: 26979591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Media mania, megalomania and misleading research: the need for caution in scientific publication.
Higgins A
Vet J; 2003 Nov; 166(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 14550726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Time to finger point or fix? An invitation to join ongoing efforts to promote ethical authorship and other good publication practices.
Woolley KL; Gertel A; Hamilton CW; Jacobs A; Snyder GP;
Ann Pharmacother; 2013; 47(7-8):1084-7. PubMed ID: 23800751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Yucha CB
Biol Res Nurs; 2002 Oct; 4(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 12408212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.
Angell M
JAMA; 2008 Sep; 300(9):1069-71. PubMed ID: 18768418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. No ghosts here please.
Warlow C
Pract Neurol; 2007 Apr; 7(2):72-3. PubMed ID: 17430870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research Methods & Reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines.
Graf C; Battisti WP; Bridges D; Bruce-Winkler V; Conaty JM; Ellison JM; Field EA; Gurr JA; Marx ME; Patel M; Sanes-Miller C; Yarker YE;
BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b4330. PubMed ID: 19946142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Trust, Peer Review, and the Pandemic.
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 Sep; 33(9):455-456. PubMed ID: 32810057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An examination of sources of peer-review bias.
Blackburn JL; Hakel MD
Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):378-82. PubMed ID: 16683923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
