These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27351552)

  • 1. Now hear this: Inattentional deafness depends on task relatedness.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Cohen AJ; Cooper NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2527-2546. PubMed ID: 27351552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Load-induced inattentional deafness.
    Raveh D; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):483-92. PubMed ID: 25287617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory perceptual load: A review.
    Murphy S; Spence C; Dalton P
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():40-48. PubMed ID: 28189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms: Inter-individual differences, electrophysiological signature and single trial classification.
    Dehais F; Roy RN; Scannella S
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():51-59. PubMed ID: 30508609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing.
    Murphy S; Fraenkel N; Dalton P
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 23969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli.
    Schomaker J; Meeter M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():74-80. PubMed ID: 24486809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.