229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27352558)
1. The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal patients.
Hasegawa K; Torii Y; Kato R; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 27352558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications of laser conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure in pre- and postmenopausal patients.
Kiuchi K; Hasegawa K; Motegi E; Kosaka N; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(6):803-808. PubMed ID: 29943925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up.
Penna C; Fambrini M; Fallani MG; Pieralli A; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):771-5. PubMed ID: 15721425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CO2 laser cylindrical excision or standard re-conization for persistent-recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-CIN) in women of fertile age.
Fambrini M; Penna C; Pieralli A; Fallani MG; Andersson KL; Lozza V; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(6B):3871-5. PubMed ID: 19192643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.
Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
