229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27352558)
21. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.
Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CO2 laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II-III: complications and efficacy.
Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE; Bratt H; Tingulstad S; Lie AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 May; 77(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 9654180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laser conization assisted by crypt visualization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bandieramonte G; Lomonico S; Quattrone P; Stefanon B; Merola M; Bucci A
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9469287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Takac I; Gorisek B
Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Residual disease following conization of women with stage IA-IB1 cervical carcinoma in a high incidence region.
Chatchotikawong U; Ruengkhachorn I; Leelaphatanadit C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(17):7383-7. PubMed ID: 25227846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.
Ciavattini A; Delli Carpini G; Moriconi L; Clemente N; Montik N; De Vincenzo R; Del Fabro A; Buttignol M; Ricci C; Moro F; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020675. PubMed ID: 29555794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [High-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions: evaluation of the factors determining an unfavorable outcome after conization].
Fonseca FV; Tomasich FD; Jung JE
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 33(11):334-40. PubMed ID: 22267111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The efficacy of cervical conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women.
Holcomb K; Matthews RP; Chapman JE; Abulafia O; Lee YC; Borges A; Buhl A
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 10479504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
