BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27352918)

  • 1. Accuracy Rates of Sex Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists through Comparison with DNA Typing Results in Forensic Casework.
    Thomas RM; Parks CL; Richard AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1307-10. PubMed ID: 27352918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy Rates of Ancestry Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists Using Identified Forensic Cases.
    Thomas RM; Parks CL; Richard AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):971-974. PubMed ID: 28133721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic anthropology casework performance: Assessing accuracy and trends for biological profile estimates on a comprehensive sample of identified decedent cases.
    Hughes CE; Juarez C; Yim AD
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1602-1616. PubMed ID: 34160079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework.
    Krishan K; Chatterjee PM; Kanchan T; Kaur S; Baryah N; Singh RK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():165.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26926105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism.
    Ubelaker DH; DeGaglia CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():407.e1-407.e7. PubMed ID: 28698063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The posterior portion of the ilium as a sex indicator: A validation study.
    Bonczarowska JH; Bonicelli A; Papadomanolakis A; Kranioti EF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():216.e1-216.e6. PubMed ID: 30528515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal estimation and identification in American and East European populations.
    Kimmerle EH; Jantz RL; Konigsberg LW; Baraybar JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 18471195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism of the lateral angle: Is it really applicable in forensic sex estimation?
    Bonczarowska JH; McWhirter Z; Kranioti EF
    Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105052. PubMed ID: 33515979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of sex from the metric assessment of digital hand radiographs in a Western Australian population.
    DeSilva R; Flavel A; Franklin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():314.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25263690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a contemporary Spanish population.
    García-Parra P; Pérez Fernández Á; Djorojevic M; Botella M; Alemán I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():313.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25102779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic.
    Tise ML; Spradley MK; Anderson BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 23127214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metric Assessment of the Pubic Bone Using Known and Novel Data Points for Sex Estimation.
    Blake KAS; Hartnett-McCann K
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 29341124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of age estimation in forensic anthropology: perspectives and practical considerations.
    Márquez-Grant N
    Ann Hum Biol; 2015; 42(4):308-22. PubMed ID: 26366990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary.
    Weiss E
    Arch Sex Behav; 2024 May; 53(5):1595-1608. PubMed ID: 38565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex estimation research trends in forensic anthropology between 2000 and 2022 in five prominent journals.
    Ferrell MJ; Schultz JJ; Adams DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1138-1154. PubMed ID: 38600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting posterior probabilities to meet predefined accuracy criteria: A proposal for a novel approach to osteometric sex estimation.
    Jerković I; Bašić Ž; Anđelinović Š; Kružić I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jun; 311():110273. PubMed ID: 32272305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex estimation using external morphology of the frontal bone and frontal sinuses in a contemporary Czech population.
    Čechová M; Dupej J; Brůžek J; Bejdová Š; Horák M; Velemínská J
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jul; 133(4):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 30982130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the obturator foramen as a sex assessment trait.
    Rennie SR; Eliopoulos C; Gonzalez S
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Jun; 19(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 35960449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods.
    Avent PR; Hughes CE; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 34799862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.