BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27352950)

  • 21. E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?
    Couchman GR; Forjuoh SN; Rascoe TG; Reis MD; Koehler B; Walsum KL
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jan; 74(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 15626633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients.
    Boukus ER; Grossman JM; O'Malley AS
    Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2010 Oct; (134):1-5. PubMed ID: 20939158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgeons' and nurses' use of e-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients.
    Kagan SH; Clarke SP; Happ MB
    Head Neck; 2005 Feb; 27(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15515156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.
    Bhor M; Mason HL
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Dec; 2(4):512-32. PubMed ID: 17161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.
    Dash J; Haller DM; Sommer J; Junod Perron N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):549. PubMed ID: 27716256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents.
    Anand SG; Feldman MJ; Geller DS; Bisbee A; Bauchner H
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):1283-8. PubMed ID: 15867036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient-initiated e-mails to providers: associations with out-of-pocket visit costs, and impact on care-seeking and health.
    Reed M; Graetz I; Gordon N; Fung V
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Dec; 21(12):e632-9. PubMed ID: 26760425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physician e-mail and telephone contact after emergency department visit improves patient satisfaction: a crossover trial.
    Patel PB; Vinson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Jun; 61(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 23465304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Head and neck cancer patient and family member interest in and use of E-mail to communicate with clinicians.
    Kagan SH; Clarke SP; Happ MB
    Head Neck; 2005 Nov; 27(11):976-81. PubMed ID: 16155921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message.
    White CB; Moyer CA; Stern DT; Katz SJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15064295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.
    Rosen P; Kwoh CK
    Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):701-6. PubMed ID: 17908755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: a pilot study.
    Leong SL; Gingrich D; Lewis PR; Mauger DT; George JH
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2005; 18(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 15879565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication.
    Neill RA; Mainous AG; Clark JR; Hagen MD
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Mar; 3(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 8180718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. E-mails in a Psychiatric Practice: Why Patients Send Them and How Psychiatrists Respond.
    Moldawsky RJ; Shah PV
    Perm J; 2016; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 26562306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities.
    Fridsma DB; Ford P; Altman R
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():15-9. PubMed ID: 7949909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Ladies prefer to contact their doctor by e-mail. Experiences based on data from an e-mail mail-box of a community health center in a sparsely-populated area].
    Edman P; Hambraeus J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):328-9. PubMed ID: 12607379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [E-mail communication in general practice].
    Kjaer NK; Jepsen KL; Ruwald S; Jepsen NP; Nielsen HH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Nov; 167(47):4461-5. PubMed ID: 16305766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Older patients' enthusiasm to use electronic mail to communicate with their physicians: cross-sectional survey.
    Singh H; Fox SA; Petersen NJ; Shethia A; Street RL
    J Med Internet Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):e18. PubMed ID: 19632972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Professional e-mail communication among health care providers: proposing evidence-based guidelines.
    Malka ST; Kessler CS; Abraham J; Emmet TW; Wilbur L
    Acad Med; 2015 Jan; 90(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 25162617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.