322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27353018)
1. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.
Rengarajan A; Drapekin J; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27353018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) Complements Single-Swallow (SS) Analysis for High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM).
Leopold A; Yu D; Bhuta R; Kataria R; Lu X; Jehangir A; Harrison M; Friedenberg F; Malik Z; Schey R; Parkman HP
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Aug; 64(8):2206-2213. PubMed ID: 30805798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.
Jain A; Baker JR; Chen JW
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13297. PubMed ID: 29368366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.
Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of viscosity and volume on the patterns of esophageal motility in healthy adults using high-resolution manometry.
Park JH; Lee H; Rhee PL; Park JH
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 24571425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Jackhammer esophagus with and without esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction demonstrates altered neural control resembling type 3 achalasia.
Quader F; Mauro A; Savarino E; Tolone S; de Bortoli N; Franchina M; Ghisa M; Edelman K; Jha LK; Penagini R; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2019 Sep; 31(9):e13678. PubMed ID: 31310444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.
Shi Y; Xiao Y; Peng S; Lin J; Xiong L; Chen M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 28(10):1611-5. PubMed ID: 23730912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry.
Krause AJ; Su H; Triggs JR; Beveridge C; Baumann AJ; Donnan E; Pandolfino JE; Carlson DA
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Mar; 33(3):e14000. PubMed ID: 33043557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Quader F; Reddy C; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2017 Jul; 313(1):G73-G79. PubMed ID: 28408642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.
Mohd Said MR; Wong Z; Abdul Rani R; Ngiu CS; Raja Ali RA; Lee YY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 May; 36(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33002243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical characteristics associated with esophageal motility function.
Tanaka Y; Ihara E; Nakamura K; Muta K; Fukaura K; Mukai K; Bai X; Takayanagi R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1133-40. PubMed ID: 26670865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.
Xiang X; Tu L; Zhang X; Xie X; Hou X
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 23384164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution esophageal manometry in pediatrics: Effect of esophageal length on diagnostic measures.
Singendonk MMJ; Ferris LF; McCall L; Seiboth G; Lowe K; Moore D; Hammond P; Couper R; Abu-Assi R; Cock C; Benninga MA; van Wijk MP; Omari TI;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2020 Jan; 32(1):e13721. PubMed ID: 31569287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraction Reserve With Ineffective Esophageal Motility on Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry is Associated With Lower Acid Exposure Times Compared With Absent Contraction Reserve.
Quader F; Rogers B; Sievers T; Mumtaz S; Lee M; Lu T; Gyawali CP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Dec; 115(12):1981-1988. PubMed ID: 32826576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bolus clearance in esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction is associated with strength of peristalsis.
Jain A; Baker JR; Rubenstein JH; Chen JW
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Sep; 29(9):. PubMed ID: 28466506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the impact of position, volume, and consistency on high-resolution esophageal manometry outcomes.
Basnayake C; Jandee S; Geeraerts A; Geysen H; Pauwels A; Timmermans L; Vanuytsel T; Rommel N; Tack J
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jul; 35(7):e14593. PubMed ID: 37036395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of esophageal dysmotility elicited by multiple rapid swallows.
Tadros M; Tran V; Shah V; Yodice M
Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 18(2):353-361. PubMed ID: 33011871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.
Mello MD; Duraiswamy S; Price LH; Li Y; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 25394785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders].
Sakai M; Saito H; Kuriyama K; Yoshida T; Kumakura Y; Hara K; Sohda M; Kuwano H; Shirabe K
Kyobu Geka; 2018 Sep; 71(10):894-899. PubMed ID: 30310046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
