BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27353097)

  • 1. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging].
    Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on rectal cancer by PET-CT computer imaging combined with MRI technology.
    Li F; Hu J; Jiang H; Sun Y
    J Infect Public Health; 2020 Sep; 13(9):1347-1353. PubMed ID: 31289005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Kiyomatsu T; Hata K; Nozawa H; Morikawa T; Watanabe T
    Tech Coloproctol; 2018 May; 22(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29623475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
    Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of magnetic resonance in "non-operative treatment" strategy for rectal cancer].
    Wang Y; Chen G
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):630-634. PubMed ID: 28643307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Cote A; Florin FG; Mois E; Elisei R; Badea R; Mare C; Hajjar NA; Iancu C; Lebovici A
    Ann Ital Chir; 2018; 89():168-176. PubMed ID: 29848812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-energy CT can detect malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
    Al-Najami I; Lahaye MJ; Beets-Tan RGH; Baatrup G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():81-88. PubMed ID: 28583651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of
    Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and prostate cancer.
    Birkhäuser FD; Studer UE; Froehlich JM; Triantafyllou M; Bains LJ; Petralia G; Vermathen P; Fleischmann A; Thoeny HC
    Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 23916692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis.
    de Jong EA; ten Berge JC; Dwarkasing RS; Rijkers AP; van Eijck CH
    Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 26619929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Schaffzin DM; Wong WD
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2004 Jul; 4(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 15285819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Leibold T; Shia J; Ruo L; Minsky BD; Akhurst T; Gollub MJ; Ginsberg MS; Larson S; Riedel E; Wong WD; Guillem JG
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2106-11. PubMed ID: 18362367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of four imaging modalities in diagnosing lymph node involvement in rectal cancer: an overview and adjusted indirect comparison.
    Gao Y; Li J; Ma X; Wang J; Wang B; Tian J; Chen G
    Clin Exp Med; 2019 May; 19(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 30900099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
    Liu B; Gao S; Li S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
    Cerny M; Dunet V; Prior JO; Hahnloser D; Wagner AD; Meuli RA; Schmidt S
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 41(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 26828149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controversy in the initial nodal staging of rectal cancer (MRI or PET/CT?).
    López Llobet E; Coronado Poggio M; Lancha Hernández C; Martín Hervás C; Travaglio Morales D; Monachello Araujo D; Rodado Marina S; Domínguez Gadea L
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2024; 43(3):500004. PubMed ID: 38527730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI and FDG-PET/CT based assessment of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Liang X; Yu J; Wen B; Xie J; Cai Q; Yang Q
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 28139203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.