BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27353482)

  • 1. Cancer Recurrence After Esophagectomy: Impact of Postoperative Infection in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.
    Tam V; Luketich JD; Winger DG; Sarkaria IS; Levy RM; Christie NA; Awais O; Shende MR; Nason KS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 102(5):1638-1646. PubMed ID: 27353482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
    Zahoor H; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Winger DG; Gibson MK; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25454907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esophagectomy versus endoscopic resection for patients with early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database propensity-matched study.
    Marino KA; Sullivan JL; Weksler B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 May; 155(5):2211-2218.e1. PubMed ID: 29455958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Improves Survival in Pathologic Nonresponders After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Hsu HY; Chao YK; Hsieh CH; Wen YW; Chang HK; Tseng CK; Liu YH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 102(5):1687-1693. PubMed ID: 27457831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. En bloc esophagectomy reduces local recurrence and improves survival compared with transhiatal resection after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Rizzetto C; DeMeester SR; Hagen JA; Peyre CG; Lipham JC; DeMeester TR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1228-36. PubMed ID: 18544359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis.
    Wang S; Huang Y; Xie J; Zhuge L; Shao L; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Hu H; Chen S; Lerut T; Luketich JD; Zhang J; Chen H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1441-1448. PubMed ID: 28916920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.
    Bonavina L; Scolari F; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Saino G; Asti E
    Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26422764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland: A population-based study.
    Sihvo E; Helminen O; Gunn J; Sipilä JOT; Rautava P; Kytö V
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30553631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrence after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: defining optimal follow-up intervals and testing.
    Abate E; DeMeester SR; Zehetner J; Oezcelik A; Ayazi S; Costales J; Banki F; Lipham JC; Hagen JA; DeMeester TR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Apr; 210(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 20347734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Markar SR; Gronnier C; Duhamel A; Pasquer A; Théreaux J; Chalret du Rieu M; Lefevre JH; Turner K; Luc G; Mariette C;
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):712-8. PubMed ID: 26135681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A propensity-score matching analysis comparing long-term survival of surgery alone and postoperative treatment for patients in node positive or stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.
    Yu S; Zhang W; Ni W; Xiao Z; Wang Q; Zhou Z; Feng Q; Zhang H; Chen D; Liang J; Lv J; Hui Z; He J; Gao S; Sun K; Fang D; Liu X; Li Y
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Nov; 140():159-166. PubMed ID: 31302346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.