441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27354012)
1. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
De Feo G; De Gisi S
Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling and evaluating municipal solid waste management strategies in a mega-city: the case of Ho Chi Minh City.
ThiKimOanh L; Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM; van Buuren JC; van der Vorst JG; Rulkens WH
Waste Manag Res; 2015 Apr; 33(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 25739768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia.
Milosevic I; Naunovic Z
Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 23853238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan.
Su JP; Hung ML; Chao CW; Ma HW
Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jan; 28(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19710114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.
Lu C; You JX; Liu HC; Li P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27271652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and application of the decision support system for municipal solid waste management in central Taiwan.
Chang YJ; Lin MD
Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):435-46. PubMed ID: 23444151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila.
Tseng ML
Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Sep; 156(1-4):181-97. PubMed ID: 18670898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods.
Goulart Coelho LM; Lange LC; Coelho HM
Waste Manag Res; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-28. PubMed ID: 27628285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK.
Yap HY; Nixon JD
Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():265-77. PubMed ID: 26275797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of MFA as a decision support tool for waste management in small municipalities--case study of Serbia.
Stanisavljevic N; Vujovic S; Zivancev M; Batinic B; Tot B; Ubavin D
Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jun; 33(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 26060233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sustainable solid waste management system using multi-objective decision-making model: a method for maximizing social acceptance in Hoi An city, Vietnam.
Hoang GM; Fujiwara T; Pham Phu TS; Nguyen LD
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34137-34147. PubMed ID: 30353439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-criteria analysis for municipal solid waste management in a Brazilian metropolitan area.
Santos SM; Silva MM; Melo RM; Gavazza S; Florencio L; Kato MT
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Oct; 189(11):561. PubMed ID: 29034409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of municipal solid waste collection and transportation routes.
Das S; Bhattacharyya BK
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():9-18. PubMed ID: 26152365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques.
Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A two-stage multi-attribute decision-making model for selecting appropriate locations of waste transfer stations in urban centers.
Yadav V; Kalbar PP; Karmakar S; Dikshit AK
Waste Manag; 2020 Aug; 114():80-88. PubMed ID: 32659690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternatives for solid waste management in Isfahan, Iran: a case study.
Abduli MA; Tavakolli H; Azari A
Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 23444149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
