232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27354702)
1. AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction-from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms.
Ravindranath PA; Sanner MF
Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(20):3142-3149. PubMed ID: 27354702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Definition and display of steric, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bonding properties of ligand binding sites in proteins using Lee and Richards accessible surface: validation of a high-resolution graphical tool for drug design.
Bohacek RS; McMartin C
J Med Chem; 1992 May; 35(10):1671-84. PubMed ID: 1588550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An automated method for predicting the positions of hydrogen-bonding atoms in binding sites.
Mills JE; Perkins TD; Dean PM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1997 May; 11(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 9263850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein-ligand interfaces are polarized: discovery of a strong trend for intermolecular hydrogen bonds to favor donors on the protein side with implications for predicting and designing ligand complexes.
Raschka S; Wolf AJ; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Apr; 32(4):511-528. PubMed ID: 29435780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LigVoxel: inpainting binding pockets using 3D-convolutional neural networks.
Skalic M; Varela-Rial A; Jiménez J; Martínez-Rosell G; De Fabritiis G
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 29982392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of protein-ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond pairing.
Chen D; Oezguen N; Urvil P; Ferguson C; Dann SM; Savidge TC
Sci Adv; 2016 Mar; 2(3):e1501240. PubMed ID: 27051863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated prediction of ligand-binding sites in proteins.
Harris R; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1506-17. PubMed ID: 17910060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated site-directed drug design: the prediction and observation of ligand point positions at hydrogen-bonding regions on protein surfaces.
Danziger DJ; Dean PM
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1989 Mar; 236(1283):115-24. PubMed ID: 2565576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic generation of bioinformatics tools for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
Komiyama Y; Banno M; Ueki K; Saad G; Shimizu K
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 26545824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles.
Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 22495747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AutoMap: a tool for analyzing protein-ligand recognition using multiple ligand binding modes.
Agostino M; Mancera RL; Ramsland PA; Yuriev E
J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Mar; 40():80-90. PubMed ID: 23376613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. aCSM: noise-free graph-based signatures to large-scale receptor-based ligand prediction.
Pires DE; de Melo-Minardi RC; da Silveira CH; Campos FF; Meira W
Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):855-61. PubMed ID: 23396119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognizing metal and acid radical ion-binding sites by integrating ab initio modeling with template-based transferals.
Hu X; Dong Q; Yang J; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(21):3260-3269. PubMed ID: 27378301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of structural water and CH···π interactions in HIV-1 protease and PTP1B complexes using a hydrogen bond prediction tool, HBPredicT.
Yesudas JP; Sayyed FB; Suresh CH
J Mol Model; 2011 Feb; 17(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 20490879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure.
Bordner AJ
Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18940825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MEDock: a web server for efficient prediction of ligand binding sites based on a novel optimization algorithm.
Chang DT; Oyang YJ; Lin JH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jul; 33(Web Server issue):W233-8. PubMed ID: 15991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
