268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27355764)
1. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features.
Curca IA; Parsa V; Macpherson EA; Scollie S; Vansevenant K; Zimmerman K; Lewis-Teeter J; Allen P; Parnes L; Agrawal S
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech.
Brassington W; Parker R; Bianchi F
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):530-543. PubMed ID: 36378104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA
Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.
Souza P; Arehart K; Schoof T; Anderson M; Strori D; Balmert L
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1280-1292. PubMed ID: 30998547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing aid noise suppression and working memory function.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):335-344. PubMed ID: 29316819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.
Garcia TM; Jacob RT; Mondelli MF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 27383708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcutaneous bone conductive implants in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss: audiological outcomes in noise condition.
Magliulo G; Iannella G; De Vincentiis M; Turchetta R; Portanova G; Angeletti D; Mancini P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):822-829. PubMed ID: 29939073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
