These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27355817)
1. How Big of a Problem is Analytic Error in Secondary Analyses of Survey Data? West BT; Sakshaug JW; Aurelien GA PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158120. PubMed ID: 27355817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical considerations in the analysis of complex sample survey data. Lemeshow S; Cook ED Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Oct; 47(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 10587999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complex sampling designs and statistical issues in secondary analysis. Kneipp SM; Yarandi HN West J Nurs Res; 2002 Aug; 24(5):552-66. PubMed ID: 12148835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Navigating complex sample analysis using national survey data. Saylor J; Friedmann E; Lee HJ Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 22551998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Estimate methods used with complex sampling designs: their application in the Cuban 2001 health survey]. Cañizares Pérez M; Barroso Utra I; Alfonso León A; García Roche R; Alfonso Sagué K; Chang de la Rosa M; Bonet Gorbea M; León EM Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2004 Mar; 15(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 15096290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unstable inferences? An examination of complex survey sample design adjustments using the Current Population Survey for health services research. Davern M; Jones A; Lepkowski J; Davidson G; Blewett LA Inquiry; 2006; 43(3):283-97. PubMed ID: 17176970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations. Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing. Polanin JR; Pigott TD Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comment on sampling error in the standardized mean difference with unequal sample sizes: avoiding potential errors in meta-analytic and primary research. Laczo RM; Sackett PR; Bobko P; Cortina JM J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 16060792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical and methodological issues in the analysis of complex sample survey data: practical guidance for trauma researchers. West BT J Trauma Stress; 2008 Oct; 21(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 18956450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samples. LaVange LM; Stearns SC; Lafata JE; Koch GG; Shah BV Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 8931198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications. Verbitskaya EV Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling to Eliminate Sample Induced Bias in Model Based Analysis of Unequal Probability Samples. Nahorniak M; Larsen DP; Volk C; Jordan CE PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131765. PubMed ID: 26126211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Data analysis from surveys using complex sampling methods]. Lv J; He PP; Li LM Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 29(8):832-5. PubMed ID: 19103126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations. Lakens D; Hilgard J; Staaks J BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 27241618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: an introduction. Shadish WR J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 24606971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Estimation of sampling error on data from cluster sample survey]. Lv J; He PP; Tu WX; Li LM Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 29(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 18785485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining information from multiple surveys to enhance estimation of measures of health. Schenker N; Raghunathan TE Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1802-11. PubMed ID: 17278184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. Bennett S; Woods T; Liyanage WM; Smith DL World Health Stat Q; 1991; 44(3):98-106. PubMed ID: 1949887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]