402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27355898)
21. Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Grady I; Gorsuch H; Wilburn-Bailey S
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jul; 201(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 15978438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions.
Pandelidis S; Heiland D; Jones D; Stough K; Trapeni J; Suliman Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2003; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 12513959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High-risk lesions at MRI-guided breast biopsy: frequency and rate of underestimation.
Lourenco AP; Khalil H; Sanford M; Donegan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 25148176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR-Guided vacuum biopsy of 206 contrast-enhancing breast lesions.
Perlet C; Schneider P; Amaya B; Grosse A; Sittek H; Reiser MF; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
Rofo; 2002 Jan; 174(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11793291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessary in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Kotani H; Yoshimura A; Adachi Y; Ishiguro J; Hisada T; Ichikawa M; Gondou N; Hattori M; Kondou N; Sawaki M; Fujita T; Iwata H
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 24989112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Gümüş M; Fish D; Jones S; Jones P; Devalia H; Sever A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 23019055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound-guided cable-free 13-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy of non-mass breast lesions.
Seo J; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Lee SH; Kim EK; Kang E; Park SY; Moon WK; Choi HY; Kim B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179182. PubMed ID: 28628656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Initial Experience with a Wireless Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Device.
Choi ER; Han BK; Ko ES; Ko EY; Choi JS; Cho EY; Nam SJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144046. PubMed ID: 26630136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-Risk Lesions Detected by MRI-Guided Core Biopsy: Upgrade Rates at Surgical Excision and Implications for Management.
Michaels AY; Ginter PS; Dodelzon K; Naunheim MR; Abbey GN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33439046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device.
Sie A; Bryan DC; Gaines V; Killebrew LK; Kim CH; Morrison CC; Poller WR; Romilly AP; Schilling K; Sung JH
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(5):945-9. PubMed ID: 16874817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiologic and Pathologic Features Associated With Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Surgical Excision.
Williams KE; Amin A; Hill J; Walter C; Inciardi M; Gatewood J; Redick M; Wick J; Hunt S; Winblad O
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):893-899. PubMed ID: 30318287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The risk of upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia detected on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy: a study of 100 cases from four academic institutions.
Khoury T; Li Z; Sanati S; Desouki MM; Chen X; Wang D; Liu S; Karabakhtsian R; Kumar P; Reig B
Histopathology; 2016 Apr; 68(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 26291517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle.
Sohn V; Arthurs Z; Herbert G; Keylock J; Perry J; Eckert M; Fellabaum D; Smith D; Brown T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2497-501. PubMed ID: 17564749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle breast biopsies resulting in high-risk histopathologic findings: upstage frequency and lesion characteristics.
Weinfurtner RJ; Patel B; Laronga C; Lee MC; Falcon SL; Mooney BP; Yue B; Drukteinis JS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 25579460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
Darling ML; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin C; Selland DL; Denison CM; DiPiro PJ; Rose DI; Rhei E; Meyer JE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 11044038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multivariate model to identify women at low risk of cancer upgrade after a core needle biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Peña A; Shah SS; Fazzio RT; Hoskin TL; Brahmbhatt RD; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Boughey JC; Visscher DW; Degnim AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 28474262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and the risk of underestimation: tissue sampling method, multifocality, and associated calcification significantly influence the diagnostic upgrade rate based on subsequent surgical specimens.
Rageth CJ; Rubenov R; Bronz C; Dietrich D; Tausch C; Rodewald AK; Varga Z
Breast Cancer; 2019 Jul; 26(4):452-458. PubMed ID: 30591993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
