404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27355898)
41. Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.
Deshaies I; Provencher L; Jacob S; Côté G; Robert J; Desbiens C; Poirier B; Hogue JC; Vachon E; Diorio C
Breast; 2011 Feb; 20(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 20619647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Wardelmann E; Kuhn W; Maass N; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):645-655. PubMed ID: 28445683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Halon A; Matkowski R
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():218. PubMed ID: 26179898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision.
Kim J; Han W; Lee JW; You JM; Shin HC; Ahn SK; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Breast; 2012 Oct; 21(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 22749854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia on Ultrasonography-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: Considerations for Further Surgical Excision.
Kim JH; Han K; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Kim EK
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Jun; 36(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 32511211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.
Badan GM; Roveda Júnior D; Piato S; Fleury Ede F; Campos MS; Pecci CA; Ferreira FA; D'Ávila C
Radiol Bras; 2016; 49(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 26929454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB; Lazarus E; Giri D; Schepps B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):W275-9. PubMed ID: 17954625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Horvath LJ; Lange RC; Carter D; Tocino I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1047-50. PubMed ID: 11000162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography: Preoperative predictor of the histologic underestimation of US-guided core needle breast biopsy.
Park AY; Son EJ; Kim JA; Han K; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2509-14. PubMed ID: 26467705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications.
Kohr JR; Eby PR; Allison KH; DeMartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):723-30. PubMed ID: 20173103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Predictors of underestimation of malignancy after image-guided core needle biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia or atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Yu CC; Ueng SH; Cheung YC; Shen SC; Kuo WL; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast J; 2015; 21(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 25772033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Papilloma diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is surgical excision still warranted?
Brennan SB; Corben A; Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Brogi E; Van Zee KJ; Morris E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):W512-9. PubMed ID: 22997402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Underestimation of malignancy of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on 11-gauge stereotactically guided Mammotome breast biopsy: an Asian breast screen experience.
Teng-Swan Ho J; Tan PH; Hee SW; Su-Lin Wong J
Breast; 2008 Aug; 17(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 18455920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions].
Fischer U; Schwethelm L; Baum FT; Luftner-Nagel S; Teubner J
Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 19582655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ductal carcinoma in situ: Is core needle biopsy ever enough?
Caswell-Smith P; Wall M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Feb; 61(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 27554420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?
Eby PR; Ochsner JE; DeMartini WB; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):3232-8. PubMed ID: 18696163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Outcomes of benign breast papillomas diagnosed at image-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy.
Hawley JR; Lawther H; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 25691147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biopsy needle technique and the accuracy of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia for mammographic abnormalities.
Zhao L; Freimanis R; Bergman S; Shen P; Perrier ND; Lesko N; Pulaski T; Pulaski S; Carr JJ; Levine EA
Am Surg; 2003 Sep; 69(9):757-62; discussion 762. PubMed ID: 14509322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Pawloski KR; Christian N; Knezevic A; Wen HY; Van Zee KJ; Morrow M; Tadros AB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Dec; 184(3):873-880. PubMed ID: 32857242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies - A 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature.
Co M; Kwong A; Shek T
Int J Surg; 2018 Jan; 49():27-31. PubMed ID: 29146271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
