99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27356526)
1. Routine pelvic examinations have no confirmed benefits, US panel concludes.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3634. PubMed ID: 27356526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations for the routine screening pelvic examination: Could they have a negative effect on physician competence?
Ladouceur R
Can Fam Physician; 2016 Jun; 62(6):460. PubMed ID: 27302994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?
Westhoff CL; Jones HE; Guiahi M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jan; 20(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21194307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening Pelvic Examinations.
Qaseem A; Humphrey L; Forciea MA
JAMA; 2017 Jul; 318(3):300. PubMed ID: 28719685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine screening pelvic examinations have a negative effect on patients.
Shepherd RW
Can Fam Physician; 2016 Aug; 62(8):627-8. PubMed ID: 27521386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Urinary Tract Infections in Active Component U.S. Armed Forces Women Before and After Routine Screening Pap Examination.
Rossi C; Hunt DJ; Clark LL; Rohrbeck P
MSMR; 2015 Jun; 22(6):13-9. PubMed ID: 26115170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urinary symptoms after a routine pelvic exam.
Tiemstra JD; Pela E
J Am Board Fam Med; 2011; 24(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 21551401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic Examinations in Nonpregnant Women.
Jin J
JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(9):984. PubMed ID: 28267857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.
Bloomfield HE; Olson A; Greer N; Cantor A; MacDonald R; Rutks I; Wilt TJ
Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 161(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 24979449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A guide to performing pelvic speculum exams: a patient-centered approach to reducing iatrogenic effects.
Williams AA; Williams M
Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 24112210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US panel reaffirms controversial 2009 mammography recommendations.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h2174. PubMed ID: 25902838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Case for Skin Cancer Screening With Total-Body Skin Examinations.
Nahar VK; Mayer JE; Grant-Kels JM
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Aug; 2(8):999-1001. PubMed ID: 27459540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The FDA Acetaminophen Advisory Committee Meeting - what is the future of acetaminophen in the United States? The perspective of a committee member.
Krenzelok EP
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2009 Sep; 47(8):784-9. PubMed ID: 19735211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot study providing evidence for the validity of a new tool to improve assignment of national pressure ulcer advisory panel stage to pressure ulcers.
Young DL; Estocado N; Landers MR; Black J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 24(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 21422841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Statement on virginity testing.
Independent Forensic Expert Group
J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Jul; 33():121-4. PubMed ID: 26048511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. JAMA PATIENT PAGE. The US Preventive Services Task Force.
Jin J
JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(16):1804. PubMed ID: 27115395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening mammography: evidence-based medicine or the death of science?
Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 20129260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based: US road and public-health side of the street.
Briss PA
Lancet; 2005 Mar 5-11; 365(9462):828-30. PubMed ID: 15752512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US Preventive Services Task Force: the gold standard of evidence-based prevention.
Campos-Outcalt D
J Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 54(6):517-9. PubMed ID: 15939002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing evidence-based screening recommendations, with consideration for rheumatology.
Calonge N
Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 40(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 25437292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
