144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27357219)
1. Hemodynamic Analysis of Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Using 4-Dimensional Flow-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Sakata M; Takehara Y; Katahashi K; Sano M; Inuzuka K; Yamamoto N; Sugiyama M; Sakahara H; Wakayama T; Alley MT; Konno H; Unno N
Circ J; 2016 Jul; 80(8):1715-25. PubMed ID: 27357219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow dynamics of type II endoleaks can determine sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair using four-dimensional flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Katahashi K; Sano M; Takehara Y; Inuzuka K; Sugiyama M; Alley MT; Takeuchi H; Unno N
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):107-116.e1. PubMed ID: 30792053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for visualization and quantification of endovascular aortic prosthesis, their endoleaks and aneurysm sacs at 1.5 T.
Salehi Ravesh M; Langguth P; Pfarr JA; Schupp J; Trentmann J; Koktzoglou I; Edelman RR; Graessner J; Greiser A; Hautemann D; Hennemuth A; Both M; Jansen O; Hövener JB; Schäfer JP
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 31075419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Systematic Review of Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Endoleak Detection and Aneurysm Diameter Measurement After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
Guo Q; Zhao J; Huang B; Yuan D; Yang Y; Zeng G; Xiong F; Du X
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Dec; 23(6):936-943. PubMed ID: 27542700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparative analysis of colour-Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Cantisani V; Ricci P; Grazhdani H; Napoli A; Fanelli F; Catalano C; Galati G; D'Andrea V; Biancari F; Passariello R
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 41(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 21095141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound and perfusion imaging for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair regarding detection and characterization of suspected endoleaks.
Pfister K; Rennert J; Uller W; Schnitzbauer AA; Stehr A; Jung W; Hofstetter P; Zorger N; Kasprzak PM; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2009; 43(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 19713606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound for detecting endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
Abbas A; Hansrani V; Sedgwick N; Ghosh J; McCollum CN
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 May; 47(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24618331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating outcomes of endoleak discrepancies between computed tomography scan and ultrasound imaging after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair.
Nagre SB; Taylor SM; Passman MA; Patterson MA; Combs BR; Lowman BG; Jordan WD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Jan; 25(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 21172584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic CT angiography after abdominal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: differences in contrast agent dynamics in the aorta and endoleaks--preliminary results.
Lehmkuhl L; Andres C; Lücke C; Foldyna B; Grothoff M; Scheinert D; Nitzsche S; Gutberlet M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Jun; 23(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 22494657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Type II lumbar endoleaks: hemodynamic differentiation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning and influence on aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Bargellini I; Napoli V; Petruzzi P; Cioni R; Vignali C; Sardella SG; Ferrari M; Bartolozzi C
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Jan; 41(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 15696037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of retrograde collateral (type II) endoleak using a new canine model.
Dayal R; Mousa A; Bernheim J; Hollenbeck S; Henderson P; Prince M; Gordon R; Badimon J; Fuster V; Marin ML; Kent KC; Faries PL
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):985-94. PubMed ID: 15557915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Endoleaks Following Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Endovascular Aortic Repair-: A Comparison of Standard and Dynamic 4D-Computed Tomography Angiography.
Waldeck S; Overhoff D; Brockmann MA; Becker BV
J Endovasc Ther; 2023 Oct; 30(5):739-745. PubMed ID: 35582987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review.
Habets J; Zandvoort HJ; Reitsma JB; Bartels LW; Moll FL; Leiner T; van Herwaarden JA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Apr; 45(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 23403221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systolic Sac Pressure Index for the Prediction of Persistent Type II Endoleak for 12 Months After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Ikoma A; Nakai M; Sato M; Sato H; Minamiguchi H; Sonomura T; Nishimura Y; Okamura Y
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 26353899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and characterization of endoleaks following endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) with quantitative perfusion analysis (TIC) compared to CT angiography (CTA).
Jung EM; Rennert J; Fellner C; Uller W; Jung W; Schreyer A; Heiss P; Hoffstetter P; Feuerbach S; Kasparzk P; Zorger N; Pfister K
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):564-70. PubMed ID: 19941253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic repair: comparison between magnetic resonance angiography and blood-pool contrast agent and dual-phase computed tomography angiography.
Wieners G; Meyer F; Halloul Z; Peters N; Rühl R; Dudeck O; Tautenhahn J; Ricke J; Pech M
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1135-42. PubMed ID: 20924762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of carbon dioxide digital subtraction versus standard contrast arteriography in the detection of endoleaks in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs.
Huang SG; Woo K; Moos JM; Han S; Lew WK; Chao A; Hamilton A; Ochoa C; Hood DB; Rowe VL; Weaver FA
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 27(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 23257072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: fate of the aneurysm sac and neck changes during long-term follow-up.
Nolz R; Teufelsbauer H; Asenbaum U; Beitzke D; Funovics M; Wibmer A; Plank C; Prusa AM; Lammer J; Schoder M
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Apr; 19(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 22545884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Endoleaks with Failed Computed Tomography Angiography Diagnosis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Yang X; Chen YX; Zhang B; Jiang YX; Liu CW; Zhao RN; Wu Q; Zhang DM
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Sep; 128(18):2491-7. PubMed ID: 26365968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endograft position and endoleak detection after endovascular abdominal aortic repair with low-field tiltable MRI: a feasibility study.
van Zandwijk JK; Schuurmann RCL; Haken BT; Stassen CM; Geelkerken RH; de Vries JPM; Simonis FFJ
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Dec; 7(1):82. PubMed ID: 38123829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
