These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series. Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CLEAN: Leveraging spatial autocorrelation in neuroimaging data in clusterwise inference. Park JY; Fiecas M Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119192. PubMed ID: 35398279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating methods of correcting for multiple comparisons implemented in SPM12 in social neuroscience fMRI studies: an example from moral psychology. Han H; Glenn AL Soc Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 13(3):257-267. PubMed ID: 28446105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayes estimate of primary threshold in clusterwise functional magnetic resonance imaging inferences. Ge Y; Hare S; Chen G; Waltz JA; Kochunov P; Elliot Hong L; Chen S Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(25):5673-5689. PubMed ID: 34309050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cluster mass inference via random field theory. Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the reliability of data analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging by applying a new blockwise permutation method. Adolf D; Weston S; Baecke S; Luchtmann M; Bernarding J; Kropf S Front Neuroinform; 2014; 8():72. PubMed ID: 25165444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: A defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons. Slotnick SD Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):141-143. PubMed ID: 28002981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection. Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results. Bowring A; Maumet C; Nichols TE Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Aug; 40(11):3362-3384. PubMed ID: 31050106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Mueller K; Lepsien J; Möller HE; Lohmann G Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():345. PubMed ID: 28701944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust spatial extent inference with a semiparametric bootstrap joint inference procedure. Vandekar SN; Satterthwaite TD; Xia CH; Adebimpe A; Ruparel K; Gur RC; Gur RE; Shinohara RT Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 31282994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cluster failure revisited: Impact of first level design and physiological noise on cluster false positive rates. Eklund A; Knutsson H; Nichols TE Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2017-2032. PubMed ID: 30318709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]