BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27358003)

  • 1. [Functional genioplasty in growing patients].
    Chamberland S; Proffit WR; Chamberland PE
    Orthod Fr; 2016 Jun; 87(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 27358003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional genioplasty in growing patients.
    Chamberland S; Proffit WR; Chamberland PE
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 25078974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Assessment of soft-tissue vs hard-tissue changes after isolated functional genioplasty].
    Chamberland S; Nataf N
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):213-233. PubMed ID: 36217582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of soft-tissue vs hard-tissue changes after isolated functional genioplasty.
    Chamberland S; Nataf N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):e554-e570. PubMed ID: 35428558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of genioplasty on mandibular growth during puberty.
    Frapier L; Jaussent A; Yachouh J; Goudot P; Dauvilliers Y; Picot MC
    Int Orthod; 2010 Dec; 8(4):342-59. PubMed ID: 21094105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.
    Park JY; Kim MJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 23395297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Genioplasty on the Pharyngeal Airway Space Following Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery.
    Torres HM; Valladares-Neto J; Torres ÉM; Freitas RZ; Silva MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):189.e1-189.e12. PubMed ID: 27728776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of mandibular genioplasty using a stereolithographic surgical guide: in vitro comparison with a manual measurement method based on preoperative surgical simulation.
    Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2032-42. PubMed ID: 24780609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective study of advancement genioplasty.
    Park HS; Ellis E; Fonseca RJ; Reynolds ST; Mayo KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 May; 67(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 2654795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1249-60. PubMed ID: 23562358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The extent of chin ptosis and lower incisor exposure changes following the osseous genioplasties.
    Soydan SS; Cubuk S; Pektas ZO; Uckan S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013; 24(5):e445-58. PubMed ID: 24036810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement of chin profile after mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty for correction of prognathism and long chin.
    Ho CT; Huang CS; Lo LJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1198-206. PubMed ID: 22692788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Aesthetic success in genioplasties procedures criteria].
    Raberin M
    Orthod Fr; 2016 Jun; 87(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 27358005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue response after chin advancement using two different genioplasty techniques: a preliminary technical comparative study.
    Seifeldin SA; Shawky M; Hicham Nouman SM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1383-8. PubMed ID: 24926726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue changes with combined mandibular setback and advancement genioplasty.
    Scheideman GB; Legan HL; Bell WH
    J Oral Surg; 1981 Jul; 39(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 6940958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion.
    de Lir Ade L; de Moura WL; Oliveira Ruellas AC; Gomes Souza MM; Nojima LI
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseous remodeling after inferior border osteotomy for chin augmentation: an indication for early surgery.
    Martinez JT; Turvey TA; Proffitt WR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Oct; 57(10):1175-80; discussion 1181. PubMed ID: 10513862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single stage surgery for contouring the prominent mandibular angle with a broad chin deformity: en-bloc Mandibular Angle-Body-Chin Curved Ostectomy (MABCCO) and Outer Cortex Grinding (OCG).
    Zhang C; Teng L; Chan FC; Xu JJ; Lu JJ; Xie F; Zhao JY; Xu MB; Jin XL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1225-33. PubMed ID: 24754914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postsurgical stability after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation following upper premolar extraction.
    Kim JW; Lee NK; Yun PY; Moon SW; Kim YK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1968.e1-1968.e11. PubMed ID: 23988146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of trabecular changes following advancement genioplasty combined with or without bilateral sagittal split osteotomy by fractal analysis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Çoban G; Öztürk T; Bilge S; Canger EM; Demirbaş AE
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):160. PubMed ID: 36934234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.