217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27359109)
1. Targeting transradial approach: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Del Furia F; Giustino G; Chieffo A
Panminerva Med; 2016 Dec; 58(4):329-340. PubMed ID: 27359109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.
Ocsan RJ; Doost A; Marley P; Farshid A
J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():4397697. PubMed ID: 33312077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-Analysis of Transradial vs Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Jhand A; Atti V; Gwon Y; Dhawan R; Turagam MK; Mamas MA; Brilakis ES; Kumar A; Katta N; Chatzizisis Y; Parikh M; Abbott JD; Kirtane AJ; Bhatt DL; Velagapudi P
Am J Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 141():23-30. PubMed ID: 33220324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transradial versus transfemoral access for female patients who underwent primary PCI in STEMI: Two years follow-up data from acute STEMI interventional registry.
Kedev S; Sukmawan R; Kalpak O; Dharma S; Antov S; Kostov J; Pejkov H; Spiroski I
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 217 Suppl():S16-20. PubMed ID: 27372739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.
Kuno T; Hirano K; Imaeda S; Hashimoto K; Ryuzaki T; Saito T; Yamazaki H; Tabei R; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 30(6):212-217. PubMed ID: 29335385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.
Kolkailah AA; Alreshq RS; Muhammed AM; Zahran ME; Anas El-Wegoud M; Nabhan AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 4(4):CD012318. PubMed ID: 29665617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.
Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23453093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
