These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27362472)

  • 1. CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites.
    Dai Z; Viswanathan H; Middleton R; Pan F; Ampomah W; Yang C; Jia W; Xiao T; Lee SY; McPherson B; Balch R; Grigg R; White M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7546-54. PubMed ID: 27362472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CO
    Roefs P; Moretti M; Welkenhuysen K; Piessens K; Compernolle T
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 239():167-177. PubMed ID: 30901695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
    Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pore-scale flow simulation of supercritical CO
    Chowdhury S; Rakesh M; Medhi S; Trivedi J; Sangwai JS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76003-76025. PubMed ID: 35665890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Direct Air Capture Integrated with Wind Energy and Enhanced Oil Recovery.
    Datta A; Krishnamoorti R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(5):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 36692891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic leverage affords post-combustion capture of 43% of carbon emissions: Supersonic separators for methanol hydrate inhibitor recovery from raw natural gas and CO
    Teixeira AM; Arinelli LO; de Medeiros JL; Araújo OQF
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():534-550. PubMed ID: 30771673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration of Process Emissions from the U.S. Industrial Sector.
    Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Maynard D; Psarras P; He J; Rufael T; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7524-7532. PubMed ID: 32432460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underground geological sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO
    Fareed AG; Khoja AH; De Felice F; Petrillo A; Sultan MA; Jalalzai ZK; Daood SS
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167124. PubMed ID: 37722433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization from ammonia process in Mexico.
    Morales Mora MA; Vergara CP; Leiva MA; Martínez Delgadillo SA; Rosa-Domínguez ER
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):998-1008. PubMed ID: 27692511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A state-of-the-art review of CO
    Jiang S; Li Y; Wang F; Sun H; Wang H; Yao Z
    Environ Res; 2022 Jul; 210():112986. PubMed ID: 35192806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential evaluation of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery of tight oil reservoir in the Ordos Basin, China.
    Tian X; Cheng L; Cao R; Zhang M; Guo Q; Wang Y; Zhang J; Cui Y
    J Environ Biol; 2015 Jul; 36 Spec No():789-97. PubMed ID: 26387353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life cycle inventory of CO2 in an enhanced oil recovery system.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; McCoy ST
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8027-32. PubMed ID: 19924918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid microbial methanogenesis during CO
    Tyne RL; Barry PH; Lawson M; Byrne DJ; Warr O; Xie H; Hillegonds DJ; Formolo M; Summers ZM; Skinner B; Eiler JM; Ballentine CJ
    Nature; 2021 Dec; 600(7890):670-674. PubMed ID: 34937895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-site characterization risk analysis for commercial-scale carbon sequestration.
    Dai Z; Stauffer PH; Carey JW; Middleton RS; Lu Z; Jacobs JF; Hnottavange-Telleen K; Spangler LH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3908-15. PubMed ID: 24625081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial stochastic modeling of sedimentary formations to assess CO2 storage potential.
    Popova OH; Small MJ; McCoy ST; Thomas AC; Rose S; Karimi B; Carter K; Goodman A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(11):6247-55. PubMed ID: 24824160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the Potential of CO
    Cai L; Wu J; Zhang M; Wang K; Li B; Yu X; Hou Y; Zhao Y
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2024 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 39120385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO
    Edmonds J; Nichols C; Adamantiades M; Bistline J; Huster J; Iyer G; Johnson N; Patel P; Showalter S; Victor N; Waldhoff S; Wise M; Wood F
    Energy Policy; 2020; 146():. PubMed ID: 35444362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chemical-Assisted CO
    Fang P; Zhang Q; Zhou C; Yang Z; Yu H; Du M; Chen X; Song Y; Wang S; Gao Y; Dou Z; Cao M
    Molecules; 2024 Aug; 29(16):. PubMed ID: 39203055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of chemo-mechanical impacts of CO
    Adu-Gyamfi B; Ampomah W; Tu J; Sun Q; Erzuah S; Acheampong S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):13023. PubMed ID: 35906463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.