These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27363004)

  • 1. Featural information is sufficient to produce a left cheek bias for happiness perception.
    Low JY; Lindell AK
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Aug; 107():10-5. PubMed ID: 27363004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of autism-like traits on cheek biases for the expression and perception of happiness.
    Harris CD; Lindell AK
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Oct; 77(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 21835532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the Big Five personality traits predict individual differences in the left cheek bias for emotion perception?
    Galea S; Lindell AK
    Laterality; 2016; 21(3):200-14. PubMed ID: 26931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of left and right hemisphere brain damage on configural and featural processing of affective faces.
    Abbott JD; Wijeratne T; Hughes A; Perre D; Lindell AK
    Laterality; 2014; 19(4):455-72. PubMed ID: 24313800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left cheek bias for emotion perception, but not expression, is established in children aged 3-7 years.
    Lindell AK; Tenenbaum HR; Aznar A
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 26528640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time to turn the other cheek? The influence of left and right poses on perceptions of academic specialisation.
    Lindell AK; Savill NJ
    Laterality; 2010 Nov; 15(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 19760533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the effects of inversion on lateralisation for processing facial emotion.
    Bourne VJ
    Cortex; 2011 Jun; 47(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 20541184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cheek of a cheater: Effects of posing the left and right hemiface on the perception of trustworthiness.
    Okubo M; Ishikawa K; Kobayashi A
    Laterality; 2018 Mar; 23(2):209-227. PubMed ID: 28707557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The silent social/emotional signals in left and right cheek poses: a literature review.
    Lindell AK
    Laterality; 2013; 18(5):612-24. PubMed ID: 23157600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemifacial preferences for the perception of emotion and attractiveness differ with the gender of the one beheld.
    Dunstan CJ; Lindell AK
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(5):907-15. PubMed ID: 22077600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facing the truth: are there hemifacial differences in the communication of trustworthiness?
    Heywood-Smith V; Lindell AK
    Laterality; 2020 Mar; 25(2):150-164. PubMed ID: 31203739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do We Expect Women to Look Happier Than They Are? A Test of Gender-Dependent Perceptual Correction.
    Steephen JE; Mehta SR; Bapi RS
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):232-235. PubMed ID: 29199878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier.
    Carr EW; Brady TF; Winkielman P
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1087-1102. PubMed ID: 28594281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion.
    Coolican J; Eskes GA; McMullen PA; Lecky E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 17720290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laterality and (in)visibility in emotional face perception: Manipulations in spatial frequency content.
    Hausmann M; Innes BR; Birch YK; Kentridge RW
    Emotion; 2021 Feb; 21(1):175-183. PubMed ID: 31368746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.