101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27363397)
1. Differentiation between Viable and Dead Cryptosporidium Oocysts Using Fluorochrome Staining.
Tomonaga T; Rai SK; Uga S
Kobe J Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 61(5):E138-43. PubMed ID: 27363397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of animal infectivity and nucleic acid staining for assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum viability in water.
Neumann NF; Gyürek LL; Gammie L; Finch GR; Belosevic M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 66(1):406-12. PubMed ID: 10618255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viability Assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Vital Dyes: Dry Mounts Overestimate the Number of "Ghost" Oocysts.
Petersen HH; Enemark HL
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2018 Mar; 15(3):141-144. PubMed ID: 29185793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nucleic acid stains as indicators of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability.
Belosevic M; Guy RA; Taghi-Kilani R; Neumann NF; Gyürék LL; Liyanage LR; Millard PJ; Finch GR
Int J Parasitol; 1997 Jul; 27(7):787-98. PubMed ID: 9279581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative analysis of the efficiency of methods for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis].
Aslanova MM; Syskova TG; Chernikova EA
Med Parazitol (Mosk); 2013; (1):42-3. PubMed ID: 23805491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Measurement of morphological parameters of Cryptosporidium muris oocysts by digital image processing technology].
Bing YY; Li Y; An CL
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 23(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 16300014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a modified semi-automated immunomagnetic separation technique for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in human faeces.
Robinson G; Watkins J; Chalmers RM
J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Sep; 75(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 18571261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drying of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts to slides abrogates use of vital dyes for viability staining.
Robertson LJ; Casaert S; Valdez-Nava Y; Ehsan MA; Claerebout E
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Jan; 96():68-9. PubMed ID: 24239946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative comparison of different purification and detection methods for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
Kar S; Gawlowska S; Daugschies A; Bangoura B
Vet Parasitol; 2011 May; 177(3-4):366-70. PubMed ID: 21242035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human pathogenic Cryptosporidium species bioanalytical detection method with single oocyst detection capability.
Connelly JT; Nugen SR; Borejsza-Wysocki W; Durst RA; Montagna RA; Baeumner AJ
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2008 May; 391(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 18311563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay targeting MIC1 for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts.
Hønsvall BK; Robertson LJ
Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jan; 172():61-67. PubMed ID: 27998735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in effluent from sewage treatment plant from eastern Poland.
Sroka J; Stojecki K; Zdybel J; Karamon J; Cencek T; Dutkiewicz J
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; Spec no. 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 25000844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Infectivity of Cryptosporidium sp isolated from wild mice for calves and mice.
Klesius PH; Haynes TB; Malo LK
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1986 Jul; 189(2):192-3. PubMed ID: 3744976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts by cell culture immunofluorescence assay: applicability to environmental samples.
Schets FM; Engels GB; During M; de Roda Husman AM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):6793-8. PubMed ID: 16269711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of low and high temperatures on infectivity of Cryptosporidium muris oocysts suspended in water.
Neumayerová H; Koudela B
Vet Parasitol; 2008 May; 153(3-4):197-202. PubMed ID: 18372114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of aerobic spores as a surrogate for cryptosporidium oocysts in drinking water supplies.
Headd B; Bradford SA
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():185-202. PubMed ID: 26734779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in the feces of a preschool population: a comparison of 5 staining methods].
Martín Sánchez AM; Rodríguez Hernández J; Canut Blasco A; Dovigo Prieto C
Rev Clin Esp; 1993 Feb; 192(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 7681604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple method for extracting DNA from Cryptosporidium oocysts using the anionic surfactant LSS.
Sekikawa T; Kawasaki Y; Katayama Y; Iwahori K
N Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 29(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 21924387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relevance of Cryptosporidium parvum hsp70 mRNA amplification as a tool to discriminate between viable and dead oocysts.
Gobet P; Toze S
J Parasitol; 2001 Feb; 87(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 11227898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Viability staining and animal infectivity of Cryptosporidium andersoni oocysts after long-term storage.
Kvác M; Kvetonová D; Salát J; Ditrich O
Parasitol Res; 2007 Jan; 100(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17024363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
